Research on cognitive differences between Chinese and foreign cross-cultural brand communication design based on big data -- Taking Wahaha and Coca Cola as examples

Hongyan Xu
{"title":"Research on cognitive differences between Chinese and foreign cross-cultural brand communication design based on big data -- Taking Wahaha and Coca Cola as examples","authors":"Hongyan Xu","doi":"10.1109/ICID54526.2021.00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Culture plays an important role in brand communication, but Chinese brands have been in the situation of “products without famous brands” for a long time. This situation has seriously reduced the competition level of Chinese brands in domestic and foreign markets. Through culture, the value of brands can be increased, and consumers’ brand awareness and purchasing power can be further increased. The results show that: (1) there are material culture and symbolic culture in the brand communication of cultural resources, which can be divided into four communication strategies, including material aesthetic symbol strategy, symbol differentiation performance strategy, consumer symbol identity strategy and diversified symbol consensus strategy. (2) The type of cultural communication in the host country (distance). This paper collects brand data in the form of “big data + questionnaire survey”. By comparing and analyzing the four strategies of Chinese consumers for Chinese local enterprise representatives (Wahaha) and international famous brand (Coca Cola) in the cultural distance, this paper explores the influencing factors of improving the brand image of Chinese drinks, It provides diversified development ideas for the internationalization of Chinese famous brands.","PeriodicalId":266232,"journal":{"name":"2021 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Design (ICID)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 2nd International Conference on Intelligent Design (ICID)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICID54526.2021.00060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Culture plays an important role in brand communication, but Chinese brands have been in the situation of “products without famous brands” for a long time. This situation has seriously reduced the competition level of Chinese brands in domestic and foreign markets. Through culture, the value of brands can be increased, and consumers’ brand awareness and purchasing power can be further increased. The results show that: (1) there are material culture and symbolic culture in the brand communication of cultural resources, which can be divided into four communication strategies, including material aesthetic symbol strategy, symbol differentiation performance strategy, consumer symbol identity strategy and diversified symbol consensus strategy. (2) The type of cultural communication in the host country (distance). This paper collects brand data in the form of “big data + questionnaire survey”. By comparing and analyzing the four strategies of Chinese consumers for Chinese local enterprise representatives (Wahaha) and international famous brand (Coca Cola) in the cultural distance, this paper explores the influencing factors of improving the brand image of Chinese drinks, It provides diversified development ideas for the internationalization of Chinese famous brands.
基于大数据的中外跨文化品牌传播设计认知差异研究——以娃哈哈和可口可乐为例
文化在品牌传播中起着重要的作用,但中国品牌长期处于“有品无名牌”的状态。这种情况严重降低了中国品牌在国内外市场的竞争水平。通过文化可以增加品牌的价值,进一步提高消费者的品牌认知度和购买力。研究结果表明:(1)文化资源品牌传播中存在物质文化和符号文化,可分为物质审美符号策略、符号差异化表现策略、消费者符号认同策略和多元化符号共识策略四种传播策略。(2)东道国的文化交流类型(距离)。本文采用“大数据+问卷调查”的方式收集品牌数据。本文通过对比分析中国消费者在文化距离上对中国本土企业代表(娃哈哈)和国际知名品牌(可口可乐)的四种策略,探索提升中国饮料品牌形象的影响因素,为中国知名品牌国际化提供多元化的发展思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信