An Experts' Perspective on Enterprise Architecture Goals, Framework Adoption and Benefit Assessment

Matthias Lange, J. Mendling
{"title":"An Experts' Perspective on Enterprise Architecture Goals, Framework Adoption and Benefit Assessment","authors":"Matthias Lange, J. Mendling","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2011.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, enterprise architecture (EA) management has become an intensively discussed approach in both industry and academia for managing the complexity of an enterprise from a holistic perspective. While there is a strong academic and practical interest in EA frameworks and EA modeling, there is a notable insecurity about the cost benefit ratio of EA. In this paper, we address this research problem with a qualitative research design. We conduct a series of semi-structured interviews with industry experts on enterprise architecture in order to identify classes of EA goals, corresponding EA frameworks adoption to achieve these goals and employed EA benefit assessment approaches. The findings point to, among others, a fairly stable set of EA goals that shift over time and EA frameworks that lack modularity and adjustment capabilities to easily customize towards these goals. This paper is part of an ongoing exploratory research that aims at researching which benefits emanate from EA.","PeriodicalId":351015,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"73","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2011.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

Abstract

In recent years, enterprise architecture (EA) management has become an intensively discussed approach in both industry and academia for managing the complexity of an enterprise from a holistic perspective. While there is a strong academic and practical interest in EA frameworks and EA modeling, there is a notable insecurity about the cost benefit ratio of EA. In this paper, we address this research problem with a qualitative research design. We conduct a series of semi-structured interviews with industry experts on enterprise architecture in order to identify classes of EA goals, corresponding EA frameworks adoption to achieve these goals and employed EA benefit assessment approaches. The findings point to, among others, a fairly stable set of EA goals that shift over time and EA frameworks that lack modularity and adjustment capabilities to easily customize towards these goals. This paper is part of an ongoing exploratory research that aims at researching which benefits emanate from EA.
专家对企业架构目标、框架采用和效益评估的看法
近年来,企业架构(EA)管理已经成为工业界和学术界广泛讨论的一种方法,用于从整体角度管理企业的复杂性。虽然对EA框架和EA建模有很强的学术和实践兴趣,但对于EA的成本效益比存在明显的不安全感。在本文中,我们通过定性研究设计来解决这一研究问题。我们对企业架构方面的行业专家进行了一系列半结构化的访谈,以确定EA目标的类别、为实现这些目标而采用的相应EA框架以及所采用的EA效益评估方法。研究结果指出,在其他方面,一组相当稳定的EA目标随着时间的推移而变化,EA框架缺乏模块化和调整能力,无法轻松地定制这些目标。本文是一项正在进行的探索性研究的一部分,旨在研究EA带来的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信