Uterus-sparing surgical treatment of suture necrosis after caesarean section: Case series report

R. Cerović-Popović, Ćupić Jovana, Olga Mihaljević, Kosta Pantović, M. Radojevic
{"title":"Uterus-sparing surgical treatment of suture necrosis after caesarean section: Case series report","authors":"R. Cerović-Popović, Ćupić Jovana, Olga Mihaljević, Kosta Pantović, M. Radojevic","doi":"10.5937/smclk4-41703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Delivery by caesarean section (CS) accounts for approximately 32% of all deliveries worldwide, and it may be associated with early and late complications. Although postpartum uterine suture necrosis is not a common condition, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality in puerperal women, as well as permanent loss of fertility in these patients. In this article, we present seven patients successfully treated conservatively, who were diagnosed with uterine suture necrosis, during puerperium, after caesarean section. Case series report: We present 12 female patients in whom, in the period between February 1, 2019 and November 10, 2022, infection occurred after caesarean section was performed at the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Clinical Center of Serbia (CGO, UCCS), and clinical suspicion of the presence of uterine suture necrosis arose. Of the total number of patients diagnosed with uterine suture necrosis, seven patients were successfully treated conservatively. Conclusion: The uterus-sparing surgical treatment approach to uterine suture necrosis is a possible alternative to standard treatment, which may allow fertility preservation in patients who have not completed reproduction.","PeriodicalId":286220,"journal":{"name":"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Srpski medicinski casopis Lekarske komore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/smclk4-41703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Delivery by caesarean section (CS) accounts for approximately 32% of all deliveries worldwide, and it may be associated with early and late complications. Although postpartum uterine suture necrosis is not a common condition, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality in puerperal women, as well as permanent loss of fertility in these patients. In this article, we present seven patients successfully treated conservatively, who were diagnosed with uterine suture necrosis, during puerperium, after caesarean section. Case series report: We present 12 female patients in whom, in the period between February 1, 2019 and November 10, 2022, infection occurred after caesarean section was performed at the Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Clinical Center of Serbia (CGO, UCCS), and clinical suspicion of the presence of uterine suture necrosis arose. Of the total number of patients diagnosed with uterine suture necrosis, seven patients were successfully treated conservatively. Conclusion: The uterus-sparing surgical treatment approach to uterine suture necrosis is a possible alternative to standard treatment, which may allow fertility preservation in patients who have not completed reproduction.
保留子宫手术治疗剖宫产术后缝线坏死:病例系列报告
剖宫产(CS)约占全世界分娩总量的32%,可能与早期和晚期并发症有关。虽然产后子宫缝线坏死不是一种常见的疾病,但它与产褥期妇女的高发病率和死亡率以及这些患者的永久丧失生育能力有关。在这篇文章中,我们报告了7例成功保守治疗的患者,他们在产褥期,剖腹产后被诊断为子宫缝线坏死。病例系列报告:我们报告了12例女性患者,于2019年2月1日至2022年11月10日期间,在塞尔维亚大学临床中心妇产科诊所(CGO, UCCS)剖腹产后发生感染,临床怀疑存在子宫缝线坏死。在诊断为子宫缝线坏死的患者中,保守治疗成功的有7例。结论:保留子宫手术治疗子宫缝线坏死是标准治疗的一种可能的替代方法,可使未完成生殖的患者保留生育能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信