Icons, Images, Interpretations: Arrian,Lukian, their Relationship, and Alexander at the Kydnos

S. Müller
{"title":"Icons, Images, Interpretations: Arrian,Lukian, their Relationship, and Alexander at the Kydnos","authors":"S. Müller","doi":"10.5565/rev/karanos.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alexander was the most prominent Argead and one of the major figures in Second Sophistic literature. The Second Sophistic authors had their own respective images of Alexander, treatment of their sources, and intention to write about him. This paper aims at exploring Lucian's ironic response to the historiographical Alexander images in his time. It will be argued that by ridiculing the current Alexander images in Second Sophistic literature, particularly as provided by Arrian's Anabasis, Lucian did not mean to make fun of the historical Alexander but of his reception and the bias and artifice involved.","PeriodicalId":129714,"journal":{"name":"Karanos. Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karanos. Bulletin of Ancient Macedonian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/karanos.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alexander was the most prominent Argead and one of the major figures in Second Sophistic literature. The Second Sophistic authors had their own respective images of Alexander, treatment of their sources, and intention to write about him. This paper aims at exploring Lucian's ironic response to the historiographical Alexander images in his time. It will be argued that by ridiculing the current Alexander images in Second Sophistic literature, particularly as provided by Arrian's Anabasis, Lucian did not mean to make fun of the historical Alexander but of his reception and the bias and artifice involved.
图标,图像,解释:阿里安,卢基安,他们的关系,亚历山大在基德诺斯
亚历山大是最杰出的阿吉阿德,也是第二诡辩文学的主要人物之一。第二诡辩派的作者们对亚历山大有各自的形象,对他们的资料的处理,以及写他的意图。本文旨在探讨卢西安对亚历山大时代史学形象的反讽回应。有人会说,通过嘲笑第二诡辩派文学中当前的亚历山大形象,尤其是阿里安的《阿纳巴基斯》提供的亚历山大形象,卢西安并不是要取笑历史上的亚历山大,而是要取笑他的接受方式以及所涉及的偏见和技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信