Issues of restricting the constitutional rights of the individual when authorizing the arrest of property by the investigating judge

M. Kulbayeva
{"title":"Issues of restricting the constitutional rights of the individual when authorizing the arrest of property by the investigating judge","authors":"M. Kulbayeva","doi":"10.32523/2616-6844-2021-137-4-28-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the article, the author analyzes the norms of the current legislation about restrictions on the constitutional rights of the individual when the investigating judge authorizes such a measure of procedural coercion as the seizure of property. There were studied statistical data on the onsideration by investigating judges of applications for the authorization of the seizure of property and the amount of compensation for the established amount of material damage. The article investigates the determinants of the tendency to increase the total amount of compensation for material damage caused by a crime in comparison with the previous period. In addition to the level of inflation, the author has evaluated the coronavirus pandemic, the effectiveness of the investigative courts. The author substantiates the conclusion that it is necessary to introduce into the national legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan recommendations for its improvement, based on the judicial precedents of the European Court of Justice in cases of seizure of property. It is noted that it is necessary to regulate a separate procedural order of the seized property, which has specific features. In addition, proposals are made to resolve other issues presented in the article.","PeriodicalId":300299,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Law Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Law Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6844-2021-137-4-28-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the article, the author analyzes the norms of the current legislation about restrictions on the constitutional rights of the individual when the investigating judge authorizes such a measure of procedural coercion as the seizure of property. There were studied statistical data on the onsideration by investigating judges of applications for the authorization of the seizure of property and the amount of compensation for the established amount of material damage. The article investigates the determinants of the tendency to increase the total amount of compensation for material damage caused by a crime in comparison with the previous period. In addition to the level of inflation, the author has evaluated the coronavirus pandemic, the effectiveness of the investigative courts. The author substantiates the conclusion that it is necessary to introduce into the national legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan recommendations for its improvement, based on the judicial precedents of the European Court of Justice in cases of seizure of property. It is noted that it is necessary to regulate a separate procedural order of the seized property, which has specific features. In addition, proposals are made to resolve other issues presented in the article.
授权侦查法官查封财产时限制个人宪法权利的问题
在本文中,作者分析了现行立法规范在侦查法官授权扣押财产等程序强制措施时对个人宪法权利的限制。研究了调查法官审议授权扣押财产的申请和对确定的物质损害赔偿数额的统计数据。本文调查了与前一时期相比,犯罪造成的物质损害赔偿总额增加趋势的决定因素。除了通货膨胀水平,提交人还评估了冠状病毒大流行、调查法院的有效性。发件人的结论是,有必要根据欧洲法院在没收财产案件中的司法先例,在哈萨克斯坦共和国的国家立法中提出改进立法的建议。指出有必要单独规定扣押财产的程序程序,该程序程序具有特殊性。此外,对本文提出的其他问题也提出了解决建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信