Quantity surveyor’s perspective on document management in construction projects: an exploratory study in Sri Lanka

L.S.D. Rathnayaka, B.K.M. Nadeetharu, U. Kulatunga
{"title":"Quantity surveyor’s perspective on document management in construction projects: an exploratory study in Sri Lanka","authors":"L.S.D. Rathnayaka, B.K.M. Nadeetharu, U. Kulatunga","doi":"10.31705/wcs.2023.73.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) have become increasingly popular in recent years as construction organisations seek to improve document management efficiency, productivity, and security. However, the Quantity Surveyor (QS), a key stakeholder responsible for construction documentation management, has less adapted to it in the Sri Lankan context. Accordingly, this study used twelve expert interviews to identify the status of documentation management in the Sri Lankan construction industry from a QS perspective. Manual content analysis was used to analyse the findings. Despite the disadvantages, the conventional DMS approach is still prevalent in the Sri Lankan context. Despite the QSs having a basic understanding of the EDMS approach and being willing to transit to EDMS, they are less familiar with EDMS software. In addition, project size, limited availability of technical facilities, and the reluctance of government and professionals cause to continue this adaptation are still a barrier. The findings of this research can be based on future studies on different stakeholder perspectives. Since conventional DMS is proved to be a less efficient solution for the document management of construction projects and EDMS is also difficult to be initiated, these findings can be benchmarked by policymakers to address the identified causes of the issue.","PeriodicalId":221447,"journal":{"name":"11th World Construction Symposium - 2023","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"11th World Construction Symposium - 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31705/wcs.2023.73.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electronic Document Management Systems (EDMS) have become increasingly popular in recent years as construction organisations seek to improve document management efficiency, productivity, and security. However, the Quantity Surveyor (QS), a key stakeholder responsible for construction documentation management, has less adapted to it in the Sri Lankan context. Accordingly, this study used twelve expert interviews to identify the status of documentation management in the Sri Lankan construction industry from a QS perspective. Manual content analysis was used to analyse the findings. Despite the disadvantages, the conventional DMS approach is still prevalent in the Sri Lankan context. Despite the QSs having a basic understanding of the EDMS approach and being willing to transit to EDMS, they are less familiar with EDMS software. In addition, project size, limited availability of technical facilities, and the reluctance of government and professionals cause to continue this adaptation are still a barrier. The findings of this research can be based on future studies on different stakeholder perspectives. Since conventional DMS is proved to be a less efficient solution for the document management of construction projects and EDMS is also difficult to be initiated, these findings can be benchmarked by policymakers to address the identified causes of the issue.
工料测量师对建设项目文件管理的看法:斯里兰卡的探索性研究
电子文件管理系统(EDMS)近年来变得越来越流行,因为建筑组织寻求提高文件管理的效率、生产力和安全性。然而,负责施工文件管理的关键利益相关者——工质测量师(QS)在斯里兰卡的情况下不太适应它。因此,本研究采用了12位专家访谈,从QS的角度来确定斯里兰卡建筑行业文件管理的现状。人工内容分析用于分析结果。尽管有缺点,传统的DMS方法在斯里兰卡仍然普遍存在。尽管QSs对EDMS方法有基本的了解,并且愿意过渡到EDMS,但他们对EDMS软件不太熟悉。此外,项目规模、技术设施有限以及政府和专业人员不愿继续进行这种适应仍然是一个障碍。本研究的结果可以为未来不同利益相关者视角的研究提供依据。由于传统的DMS被证明是建筑项目文件管理效率较低的解决方案,而且EDMS也难以启动,因此这些发现可以作为决策者的基准,以解决已确定的问题原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信