Citizen Rights in a Critical Juncture: Comparing the EU and ASEAN Legal Response in the time of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Asrul Ibrahim Nur
{"title":"Citizen Rights in a Critical Juncture: Comparing the EU and ASEAN Legal Response in the time of the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Asrul Ibrahim Nur","doi":"10.15170/studia.2023.01.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article's primary objective is to explore and compare the legalinstrument adopted by regional organisations, specifically the EU and ASEAN,to impose restrictions on free movement rights during the COVID-19 Pandemic.This article uses hard and soft law classifications to denote the great number oftypes and forms of legal instruments. Furthermore, this article aims to explainthe pattern of regional organisations adopting legal tools to govern restrictionson free movement rights. Legal research methodologies analyse legalinstruments from the EU and ASEAN's official legal databases with doctrinaland comparative perspectives. The study's findings revealed two distinct trendsof adopting various types of legal instruments by the EU and ASEAN.Additionally, the choice of this type of legal instrument has ramifications forguaranteeing the practical application of citizen rights, particularly the right tofreedom of movement.","PeriodicalId":231331,"journal":{"name":"Essays of Faculty of Law University of Pécs, Yearbook of [year]","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essays of Faculty of Law University of Pécs, Yearbook of [year]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/studia.2023.01.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article's primary objective is to explore and compare the legalinstrument adopted by regional organisations, specifically the EU and ASEAN,to impose restrictions on free movement rights during the COVID-19 Pandemic.This article uses hard and soft law classifications to denote the great number oftypes and forms of legal instruments. Furthermore, this article aims to explainthe pattern of regional organisations adopting legal tools to govern restrictionson free movement rights. Legal research methodologies analyse legalinstruments from the EU and ASEAN's official legal databases with doctrinaland comparative perspectives. The study's findings revealed two distinct trendsof adopting various types of legal instruments by the EU and ASEAN.Additionally, the choice of this type of legal instrument has ramifications forguaranteeing the practical application of citizen rights, particularly the right tofreedom of movement.
关键时刻的公民权利:比较欧盟和东盟在COVID-19大流行时期的法律应对
本文的主要目的是探讨和比较区域组织(特别是欧盟和东盟)在COVID-19大流行期间为限制自由流动权利而采用的法律文书。本文用硬法和软法分类来表示法律文书的种类和形式之多。此外,本文旨在解释区域组织采用法律工具管理自由流动权利限制的模式。法律研究方法从理论和比较的角度分析欧盟和东盟的官方法律数据库的法律文书。研究结果揭示了欧盟和东盟采用不同类型法律文书的两种明显趋势。此外,选择这种类型的法律文书对保障公民权利,特别是行动自由权利的实际适用具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信