Path loss validation for urban micro cell scenarios at 3.5 GHz compared to 1.9 GHz

Ignacio Rodriguez, H. Nguyen, N. Jørgensen, T. B. Sørensen, J. Elling, M. B. Gentsch, P. Mogensen
{"title":"Path loss validation for urban micro cell scenarios at 3.5 GHz compared to 1.9 GHz","authors":"Ignacio Rodriguez, H. Nguyen, N. Jørgensen, T. B. Sørensen, J. Elling, M. B. Gentsch, P. Mogensen","doi":"10.1109/GLOCOM.2013.6831689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 3.5 GHz band is a strong candidate for future urban micro cell deployment with base station antennas located below rooftop. Compared to other frequency bands, propagation in the 3.5 GHz band is relatively unexplored for the micro cell deployment. This paper presents a measurement-based analysis of outdoor and outdoor-to-indoor propagation at 3.5 GHz in comparison to the more well-known frequency of 1.9 GHz. A simple two-slope line-of-sight/non-line-of-sight outdoor path loss model is proposed and compared to different existing path loss models. The outdoor path loss is found to be approximately 5 dB higher for 3.5 GHz compared to 1.9 GHz. The outdoor-to-indoor propagation is investigated for two office buildings and different street shops. For the different presented scenarios, penetration loss increases with frequency and is found to be up to 5 dB higher for 3.5 GHz compared with 1.9 GHz. Although some existing models predict the observations with good accuracy, we propose a model based on line-of-sight probability that is simpler and easier to apply.","PeriodicalId":233798,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2013.6831689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

The 3.5 GHz band is a strong candidate for future urban micro cell deployment with base station antennas located below rooftop. Compared to other frequency bands, propagation in the 3.5 GHz band is relatively unexplored for the micro cell deployment. This paper presents a measurement-based analysis of outdoor and outdoor-to-indoor propagation at 3.5 GHz in comparison to the more well-known frequency of 1.9 GHz. A simple two-slope line-of-sight/non-line-of-sight outdoor path loss model is proposed and compared to different existing path loss models. The outdoor path loss is found to be approximately 5 dB higher for 3.5 GHz compared to 1.9 GHz. The outdoor-to-indoor propagation is investigated for two office buildings and different street shops. For the different presented scenarios, penetration loss increases with frequency and is found to be up to 5 dB higher for 3.5 GHz compared with 1.9 GHz. Although some existing models predict the observations with good accuracy, we propose a model based on line-of-sight probability that is simpler and easier to apply.
3.5 GHz和1.9 GHz下城市微蜂窝场景的路径损耗验证
3.5 GHz频段是未来城市微蜂窝部署的有力候选者,基站天线位于屋顶下方。与其他频段相比,3.5 GHz频段的传播对于微蜂窝部署来说是相对未开发的。本文提出了一种基于测量的室外和室外到室内传播的分析,在3.5 GHz的频率与更知名的1.9 GHz频率进行比较。提出了一种简单的双斜率视线/非视线室外路径损耗模型,并与现有的不同路径损耗模型进行了比较。与1.9 GHz相比,3.5 GHz的室外路径损耗大约高出5 dB。研究了两栋办公楼和不同的街边商铺的室内外传播。在不同的场景下,穿透损耗随频率的增加而增加,3.5 GHz的穿透损耗比1.9 GHz的高出5 dB。虽然现有的一些模型对观测结果的预测精度很高,但我们提出了一个基于视距概率的模型,该模型更简单,更容易应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信