A comparative performance study of excisers for various interference classes

A. Bultan, M. Tazebay, A. Akansu
{"title":"A comparative performance study of excisers for various interference classes","authors":"A. Bultan, M. Tazebay, A. Akansu","doi":"10.1109/TFSA.1998.721441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A previously developed chirplet interference exciser is compared in performance, with the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and adaptive time-frequency (ATF) interference suppression algorithms. For comparison impulsive, sinusoidal and chirp interferers are used and the corresponding bit error rate vs. signal to interference ratio curves are obtained. It is observed that, only the chirplet exciser can suppress broadband interference. The ATF exciser is the best for both impulsive and sinusoidal interference. The DFT exciser can only be used for narrowband interference.","PeriodicalId":395542,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis (Cat. No.98TH8380)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IEEE-SP International Symposium on Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Analysis (Cat. No.98TH8380)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TFSA.1998.721441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A previously developed chirplet interference exciser is compared in performance, with the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and adaptive time-frequency (ATF) interference suppression algorithms. For comparison impulsive, sinusoidal and chirp interferers are used and the corresponding bit error rate vs. signal to interference ratio curves are obtained. It is observed that, only the chirplet exciser can suppress broadband interference. The ATF exciser is the best for both impulsive and sinusoidal interference. The DFT exciser can only be used for narrowband interference.
不同干扰等级的割齿器性能比较研究
将先前开发的一种啁啾干涉剔除器与离散傅立叶变换(DFT)和自适应时频(ATF)干扰抑制算法在性能上进行了比较。为了进行比较,使用了脉冲、正弦和啁啾干扰,并得到了相应的误码率与信噪比曲线。结果表明,只有啁啾消歧器才能抑制宽带干扰。ATF消歧器对于脉冲和正弦干扰都是最好的。DFT切除器只能用于窄带干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信