Marx-Biased Technical Change and Income Distribution: A Panel Data Analysis

Travis Campbell, Daniele Tavani
{"title":"Marx-Biased Technical Change and Income Distribution: A Panel Data Analysis","authors":"Travis Campbell, Daniele Tavani","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3196104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides a further empirical evaluation of the Neoclassical theory of distribution as opposed to Marx-biased technical change (MBTC) by applying the theoretical and empirical framework developed by Foley and Michl (1999), Michl (1999, 2009) and Basu (2010) to a panel of countries. Basu (2010) developed a test based on cross-sectional data: we argue that a panel data analysis is instrumental in increasing the efficiency and validity of the test. Our results generalize Basu’s findings in providing support for MBTC and against the Neoclassical theory of income distribution.","PeriodicalId":129015,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Marxian; Sraffian; Institutional; Evolutionary (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Marxian; Sraffian; Institutional; Evolutionary (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3196104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides a further empirical evaluation of the Neoclassical theory of distribution as opposed to Marx-biased technical change (MBTC) by applying the theoretical and empirical framework developed by Foley and Michl (1999), Michl (1999, 2009) and Basu (2010) to a panel of countries. Basu (2010) developed a test based on cross-sectional data: we argue that a panel data analysis is instrumental in increasing the efficiency and validity of the test. Our results generalize Basu’s findings in providing support for MBTC and against the Neoclassical theory of income distribution.
马克思偏倚的技术变革与收入分配:面板数据分析
本文通过将Foley和Michl(1999)、Michl(1999、2009)和Basu(2010)开发的理论和经验框架应用于一个国家小组,对新古典分配理论进行了进一步的实证评估,以反对马克思偏向的技术变革(MBTC)。Basu(2010)开发了一个基于横截面数据的测试:我们认为面板数据分析有助于提高测试的效率和有效性。我们的研究结果概括了巴苏的发现,为MBTC提供了支持,并反对新古典主义的收入分配理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信