Overtreatment in Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-, Axillary Node Negative, Non-Metastatic Early Breast Cancer

Samuel Schick, F. Schettini
{"title":"Overtreatment in Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2-, Axillary Node Negative, Non-Metastatic Early Breast Cancer","authors":"Samuel Schick, F. Schettini","doi":"10.47363/jtsr/2022(1)118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HR+ HER2- T1 N0 M0 breast cancer has very low 5-year postoperative risk of relapse (<5%) with current SoC treat- ment regimens: endocrine monotherapy or chemoendocrine com- bination therapy. Minimally aggressive treatment is ideal. Absent gene-profiling, histopathological features of the tumor are examined to predict risk of relapse. This paper establishes statistical evidence for use of an empirical prognostic index as a risk-based clinical decision aid where gene profiles are unavailable. Methods: A retrospective cohort (n=965) observed for 5 years was propensity score (PS) matched to correct baseline risk differences between chemoendocrine therapy and endocrine monotherapy treatment groups. PS were generated from logistic regression of pertinent histopathological covariates available to a clinician at the time of diagnosis onto treatment designation. Comparator groups were fur- ther equilibrated using Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling (SMOTE). Estimated treatment effects were assessed after propensity score- matching (PSM) and after SMOTE-normalized re-sampling. Results: Propensity score-matched groups (n=262) showed no difference in relapse rates between groups. Significant differences in histopatho- logical covariates remained between groups after PSM. SMOTE further minimized inter-group differences. Corresponding propen- sity score quartiles of the SMOTE groups (n=1000) were tested for proportional differences in relapse. No proportional differences in relapses were observed between groups in Q1-Q3. Proportionally, significantly more relapses occurred in the Q4 endocrine therapy group than in the Q4 chemoendocrine group. Conclusion: After matching, the PSM sample failed to produce generalizable results due to significant group imbalance for multiple predictor variables, whereas SMOTE re-sampling provided adequately risk-matched groups (standardized differences<0.2) for treatment effect anal- ysis. Individuals with HR+ HER2- T1 N0 M0 breast cancer are over-treated if they have PS<0.75, and are prescribed chemoen- docrine therapy, as no additional benefit was observed from this more aggressive treatment regimen. Conversely, individuals are under-treated, and at a significantly higher risk of relapse, if they have PS>0.75 and are not prescribed chemotherapy","PeriodicalId":403337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tumor Science Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tumor Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jtsr/2022(1)118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HR+ HER2- T1 N0 M0 breast cancer has very low 5-year postoperative risk of relapse (<5%) with current SoC treat- ment regimens: endocrine monotherapy or chemoendocrine com- bination therapy. Minimally aggressive treatment is ideal. Absent gene-profiling, histopathological features of the tumor are examined to predict risk of relapse. This paper establishes statistical evidence for use of an empirical prognostic index as a risk-based clinical decision aid where gene profiles are unavailable. Methods: A retrospective cohort (n=965) observed for 5 years was propensity score (PS) matched to correct baseline risk differences between chemoendocrine therapy and endocrine monotherapy treatment groups. PS were generated from logistic regression of pertinent histopathological covariates available to a clinician at the time of diagnosis onto treatment designation. Comparator groups were fur- ther equilibrated using Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling (SMOTE). Estimated treatment effects were assessed after propensity score- matching (PSM) and after SMOTE-normalized re-sampling. Results: Propensity score-matched groups (n=262) showed no difference in relapse rates between groups. Significant differences in histopatho- logical covariates remained between groups after PSM. SMOTE further minimized inter-group differences. Corresponding propen- sity score quartiles of the SMOTE groups (n=1000) were tested for proportional differences in relapse. No proportional differences in relapses were observed between groups in Q1-Q3. Proportionally, significantly more relapses occurred in the Q4 endocrine therapy group than in the Q4 chemoendocrine group. Conclusion: After matching, the PSM sample failed to produce generalizable results due to significant group imbalance for multiple predictor variables, whereas SMOTE re-sampling provided adequately risk-matched groups (standardized differences<0.2) for treatment effect anal- ysis. Individuals with HR+ HER2- T1 N0 M0 breast cancer are over-treated if they have PS<0.75, and are prescribed chemoen- docrine therapy, as no additional benefit was observed from this more aggressive treatment regimen. Conversely, individuals are under-treated, and at a significantly higher risk of relapse, if they have PS>0.75 and are not prescribed chemotherapy
激素受体阳性,HER2-,腋窝淋巴结阴性,非转移性早期乳腺癌的过度治疗
HR+ HER2- T1 N0 M0乳腺癌术后5年复发风险非常低(0.75),无需化疗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信