Using reading techniques to focus inspection performance

M. Halling, S. Biffl, T. Grechenig, M. Köhle
{"title":"Using reading techniques to focus inspection performance","authors":"M. Halling, S. Biffl, T. Grechenig, M. Köhle","doi":"10.1109/EURMIC.2001.952461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software inspection is a quality assurance method to detect defects early during the software development process. For inspection planning there are defect detection techniques, so-called reading techniques, which let the inspection planner focus the effectiveness of individual inspectors on specific sets of defects. For realistic planning it is important to use empirically evaluated defect detection techniques. We report on the replication of a large-scale experiment in an academic environment. The experiment evaluated the effectiveness of defect detection for inspectors who use a checklist or focused scenarios on individual and team level. A main finding of the experiments is that the teams were effective to find defects: In both experiments the inspection teams found on average more than 70% of the defects in the product. The checklist consistently was overall somewhat more effective on individual level, while the scenarios traded overall defect detection effectiveness for much better effectiveness regarding their target focus, in our case specific parts of the documents. Another main result of the study is that scenario-based reading techniques can be used in inspection planning to focus individual performance without significant loss of effectiveness on team level.","PeriodicalId":196541,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 27th EUROMICRO Conference. 2001: A Net Odyssey","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 27th EUROMICRO Conference. 2001: A Net Odyssey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EURMIC.2001.952461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Software inspection is a quality assurance method to detect defects early during the software development process. For inspection planning there are defect detection techniques, so-called reading techniques, which let the inspection planner focus the effectiveness of individual inspectors on specific sets of defects. For realistic planning it is important to use empirically evaluated defect detection techniques. We report on the replication of a large-scale experiment in an academic environment. The experiment evaluated the effectiveness of defect detection for inspectors who use a checklist or focused scenarios on individual and team level. A main finding of the experiments is that the teams were effective to find defects: In both experiments the inspection teams found on average more than 70% of the defects in the product. The checklist consistently was overall somewhat more effective on individual level, while the scenarios traded overall defect detection effectiveness for much better effectiveness regarding their target focus, in our case specific parts of the documents. Another main result of the study is that scenario-based reading techniques can be used in inspection planning to focus individual performance without significant loss of effectiveness on team level.
使用阅读技术来集中检查性能
软件检查是在软件开发过程中尽早发现缺陷的一种质量保证方法。对于检查计划,有缺陷检测技术,即所谓的阅读技术,它使检查计划人员将单个检查人员的有效性集中在特定的缺陷集上。对于现实的计划来说,使用经验评估缺陷检测技术是很重要的。我们报告了在学术环境中大规模实验的复制。该实验评估了使用检查表或在个人和团队层面上集中场景的检查人员缺陷检测的有效性。实验的一个主要发现是团队有效地发现了缺陷:在两个实验中,检查团队平均发现了产品中70%以上的缺陷。检查表始终在个人层面上总体上更有效,而场景交易总体缺陷检测有效性,以获得关于其目标焦点的更好的有效性,在我们的案例中,文档的特定部分。该研究的另一个主要结果是,基于场景的阅读技术可以用于检查计划,以关注个人绩效,而不会显著损失团队层面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信