Retomada

Thaina de Santana Alencar
{"title":"Retomada","authors":"Thaina de Santana Alencar","doi":"10.11606/issn.1981-7169.crioula.2022.200636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relação capital/produto. Abstract Furtado and his critics: from stagnation to the recovery of economic growth The article debates the ‘stagnation model’ proposed by Furtado in 1965 and 1966, and comments on Tavares and Serras’s criticism of Furtado’s model, in ‘Beyond Stagnation’ (1971). It also discusses to what extent Furtado’s 1970s texts would have represented a change in opinion, in the sense of putting aside the analytical presuppositions of the stagnation model. It is argued that the dilemmas of Furtado’s stagnation model are many, and quite different from those argued by Tavares","PeriodicalId":377204,"journal":{"name":"Revista Crioula","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Crioula","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-7169.crioula.2022.200636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Relação capital/produto. Abstract Furtado and his critics: from stagnation to the recovery of economic growth The article debates the ‘stagnation model’ proposed by Furtado in 1965 and 1966, and comments on Tavares and Serras’s criticism of Furtado’s model, in ‘Beyond Stagnation’ (1971). It also discusses to what extent Furtado’s 1970s texts would have represented a change in opinion, in the sense of putting aside the analytical presuppositions of the stagnation model. It is argued that the dilemmas of Furtado’s stagnation model are many, and quite different from those argued by Tavares
总之,
/ produto Relacao资本。本文讨论了Furtado在1965年和1966年提出的“停滞模型”,并评论了塔瓦雷斯和塞拉斯在《超越停滞》(Beyond stagnation, 1971)中对Furtado模型的批评。它还讨论了费塔多20世纪70年代的文本在多大程度上代表了一种观点的变化,即撇开停滞模型的分析性前提。有人认为,费塔多的停滞模型的困境是多方面的,与塔瓦雷斯的观点截然不同
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信