Chapter 5: Activities of the Subject’s Self-Positing

V. Petrovsky
{"title":"Chapter 5: Activities of the Subject’s Self-Positing","authors":"V. Petrovsky","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2021.1933833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider the famous schoolboy’s dilemma: “Is the Lord omnipotent?” “Yes, omnipotent!” “Then can He create a stone that He cannot Himself lift?” (If God cannot create such a stone, then He is not omnipotent; but if He can create a stone that He cannot Himself lift, then He is also not omnipotent.) It is difficult to say whether the creation of such a stone could have been in the interests of the Most High, but what is remarkable is that it seems that people constantly pose and solve this problem, thereby discovering a paradoxical property of their own activity: its nonadaptivity. . . . There are two girls in the room. The first girl is of school age. She has to perform a very simple task: to reach an object lying in the middle of the table at such a distance from the edges, fenced off by a low barrier, that it is impossible to reach it directly with her hand; it would work to use a stick that is lying here. The girl walks around the table, tries one thing and then another, but the problem is still not solved. A younger girl, about five years old, at first watches quietly, and then begins to give one suggestion after another: “jump up” (this tip is clearly unsuccessful), “use the stick” (the only thing that can will work). Finally, she takes the stick herself and tries to reach the object. But the older girl quickly takes this “tool” away from her, explaining that it is not hard to reach it with the stick, “anyone can do that.” At that moment, an experimenter enters the room, to whom the test subject declares that she cannot reach the object on the table. How should this phenomenon be interpreted? Does the schoolgirl perhaps simply misunderstand the task (for example, assuming that she is “not allowed” to use the stick)? . . . No, as it turns out. What if we slightly change the conditions of the experiment? Without eliminating the objective significance of the goal to be achieved (the object lying on the table), we artificially change the subject’s attitude to how it can be achieved (for example, we explain to her that she may use the stick). The subject, of course, does not refuse to act as instructed, but tries to avoid the reward","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2021.1933833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consider the famous schoolboy’s dilemma: “Is the Lord omnipotent?” “Yes, omnipotent!” “Then can He create a stone that He cannot Himself lift?” (If God cannot create such a stone, then He is not omnipotent; but if He can create a stone that He cannot Himself lift, then He is also not omnipotent.) It is difficult to say whether the creation of such a stone could have been in the interests of the Most High, but what is remarkable is that it seems that people constantly pose and solve this problem, thereby discovering a paradoxical property of their own activity: its nonadaptivity. . . . There are two girls in the room. The first girl is of school age. She has to perform a very simple task: to reach an object lying in the middle of the table at such a distance from the edges, fenced off by a low barrier, that it is impossible to reach it directly with her hand; it would work to use a stick that is lying here. The girl walks around the table, tries one thing and then another, but the problem is still not solved. A younger girl, about five years old, at first watches quietly, and then begins to give one suggestion after another: “jump up” (this tip is clearly unsuccessful), “use the stick” (the only thing that can will work). Finally, she takes the stick herself and tries to reach the object. But the older girl quickly takes this “tool” away from her, explaining that it is not hard to reach it with the stick, “anyone can do that.” At that moment, an experimenter enters the room, to whom the test subject declares that she cannot reach the object on the table. How should this phenomenon be interpreted? Does the schoolgirl perhaps simply misunderstand the task (for example, assuming that she is “not allowed” to use the stick)? . . . No, as it turns out. What if we slightly change the conditions of the experiment? Without eliminating the objective significance of the goal to be achieved (the object lying on the table), we artificially change the subject’s attitude to how it can be achieved (for example, we explain to her that she may use the stick). The subject, of course, does not refuse to act as instructed, but tries to avoid the reward
第五章:主体的自我定位活动
想想那个著名的小学生的困境:“上帝是全能的吗?”“是的,无所不能!””“那么他能造一块自己搬不动的石头吗?(如果上帝不能创造这样的石头,那么他就不是全能的;但如果他能创造一块他自己都举不起来的石头,那么他也不是全能的。)很难说创造这样一种石头是否符合至高者的利益,但值得注意的是,人们似乎不断提出并解决这个问题,从而发现了他们自己活动的一个矛盾性质:它的非适应性. . . .房间里有两个女孩。第一个女孩到了上学的年龄。她必须完成一项非常简单的任务:够到桌子中央的一个物体,这个物体离桌子边缘有一段距离,被一个低矮的栅栏隔开,她的手不可能直接够到它;用一根放在这里的棍子就行了。女孩绕着桌子走了一圈,试了一种又一种,但问题仍然没有解决。一个更小的女孩,大约五岁,起初静静地看着,然后开始一个接一个地提出建议:“跳起来”(这个建议显然是不成功的),“用棍子”(唯一能起作用的东西)。最后,她自己拿起棍子,试着去够那个东西。但是大一点的女孩迅速地把这个“工具”从她手中夺过,解释说用棍子去拿它并不难,“任何人都能做到。”这时,一个实验者走进房间,被试者对他说她够不到桌子上的东西。这种现象应该如何解释呢?女学生可能只是误解了任务(例如,假设她“不允许”使用棍子)?……事实证明,不是的。如果我们稍微改变一下实验条件会怎么样?在不消除要实现的目标(桌子上的物体)的客观意义的情况下,我们人为地改变了主体对如何实现目标的态度(例如,我们向她解释她可以使用棍子)。当然,受试者不会拒绝按照指示行事,而是试图避开奖励
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信