Assessing integrated measurement and evaluation strategies: A case study

L. Olsina, M. Papa, Pablo Becker
{"title":"Assessing integrated measurement and evaluation strategies: A case study","authors":"L. Olsina, M. Papa, Pablo Becker","doi":"10.1109/CEE-SECR.2011.6188462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a case study aimed at understanding and comparing integrated strategies for software measurement and evaluation, considering a strategy as a resource from the assessed entity standpoint. The evaluation focus is on the quality of the capabilities of a measurement and evaluation strategy taking into account three key aspects: i) the conceptual framework, centered on a terminological base, ii) the explicit specification of the process, and iii) the methodological/technological support. We consider a strategy is integrated if to great extent these three capabilities are met simultaneously. In the illustrated case study two strategies i.e. GQM+Strategies (Goal-Question-Metric), and GOCAME (Goal-Oriented Context-Aware Measurement and Evaluation) are evaluated. The given results allowed us the understanding of strengths and weaknesses for both strategies, and planning improvement actions as well.","PeriodicalId":131009,"journal":{"name":"2011 7th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 7th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference (CEE-SECR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEE-SECR.2011.6188462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper presents a case study aimed at understanding and comparing integrated strategies for software measurement and evaluation, considering a strategy as a resource from the assessed entity standpoint. The evaluation focus is on the quality of the capabilities of a measurement and evaluation strategy taking into account three key aspects: i) the conceptual framework, centered on a terminological base, ii) the explicit specification of the process, and iii) the methodological/technological support. We consider a strategy is integrated if to great extent these three capabilities are met simultaneously. In the illustrated case study two strategies i.e. GQM+Strategies (Goal-Question-Metric), and GOCAME (Goal-Oriented Context-Aware Measurement and Evaluation) are evaluated. The given results allowed us the understanding of strengths and weaknesses for both strategies, and planning improvement actions as well.
评估综合测量和评价策略:一个案例研究
本文提出了一个案例研究,旨在理解和比较软件度量和评估的集成策略,从被评估实体的角度考虑策略作为资源。评估的重点是考虑到三个关键方面的测量和评估策略的能力质量:1)以术语基础为中心的概念框架,2)过程的明确规范,以及3)方法/技术支持。如果在很大程度上同时满足这三种能力,我们认为一个战略是完整的。在案例研究中,对GQM+策略(目标-问题-度量)和gocome(目标导向的上下文感知测量和评估)两种策略进行了评估。给定的结果使我们能够理解这两种策略的优势和劣势,并计划改进行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信