When Indonesia Comedians Talked about Omnibus Law: Pragmatically Comprehension

Fithrah Auliya Ansar, Darwissyah Irwan Duhir
{"title":"When Indonesia Comedians Talked about Omnibus Law: Pragmatically Comprehension","authors":"Fithrah Auliya Ansar, Darwissyah Irwan Duhir","doi":"10.24256/IDEAS.V9I1.1879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to understand the message and the way of comedians in delivering their messages toward omnibus law in Indonesia. How the comedians build their power through language to confirm their position. Pragmatics analysis was a main tool in analyzing the language used by comedians. This research observes two videos of different comedians commenting the law through social media. Both videos examine the truth of comedians’ voice on Omnibus law. The comedians absolutely have their special characteristic in reflecting their ideology towards the regulation. Their position reflected from the speech that supporting the demonstrators against omnibus law validation. The result shows that both comedians used some features such as irony, metaphors, and satires in criticizing the government. Plethora signs are given by them in comparing the power and effectiveness of previous and current government in coping country’s problems. Moreover, there are several pragmatics cues used to inform people about their position in facing the government’s policy.","PeriodicalId":416023,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24256/IDEAS.V9I1.1879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to understand the message and the way of comedians in delivering their messages toward omnibus law in Indonesia. How the comedians build their power through language to confirm their position. Pragmatics analysis was a main tool in analyzing the language used by comedians. This research observes two videos of different comedians commenting the law through social media. Both videos examine the truth of comedians’ voice on Omnibus law. The comedians absolutely have their special characteristic in reflecting their ideology towards the regulation. Their position reflected from the speech that supporting the demonstrators against omnibus law validation. The result shows that both comedians used some features such as irony, metaphors, and satires in criticizing the government. Plethora signs are given by them in comparing the power and effectiveness of previous and current government in coping country’s problems. Moreover, there are several pragmatics cues used to inform people about their position in facing the government’s policy.
印尼喜剧演员谈综合法:语用理解
本研究旨在了解信息和喜剧演员的方式在传递他们的信息对印度尼西亚的综合法。喜剧演员如何通过语言建立自己的力量来确认自己的地位。语用分析是分析喜剧演员语言的主要工具。本研究观察了两个不同喜剧演员通过社交媒体评论法律的视频。这两部影片都检视了喜剧演员对综合法案的真实看法。喜剧演员在反映他们对规则的意识形态方面绝对有自己的特点。他们的立场反映在支持示威者反对综合法案生效的演讲中。结果表明,两位喜剧演员在批评政府时都使用了反讽、隐喻、讽刺等特征。他们在比较前任政府和现任政府处理国家问题的权力和有效性方面给出了过多的迹象。此外,还有一些语用线索用于告知人们在面对政府政策时的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信