Strengthening Postharvest Technology Development and Improvement Through Feedback

Adegbola, J. A. Owojaiye, O. Ogunremi, O. Aina, Olisaemeka Achime, K. C. A. Pessu
{"title":"Strengthening Postharvest Technology Development and Improvement Through Feedback","authors":"Adegbola, J. A. Owojaiye, O. Ogunremi, O. Aina, Olisaemeka Achime, K. C. A. Pessu","doi":"10.48165/ijrse.2023.3.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This inquiry is predicated on the datum or truism that all technologies have a gap  and or become obsolete at some point, and the utilization of passé technologies and  methods predisposes the agricultural sector to underdevelopment. It investigates  technological paucities and fixes for NSPRI technologies (NSPRI Smoking Kiln  (NSK), Parabolic-shaped Solar Dryer (PSSD), Ice Fish Box® (IFB®), Hermetic Steel  Drum (HSD) and Ventilated Plastic Crate (VPC)) from the perspective of users of  the technologies. The study adopted a cross-sectional research design using the in person method as its feedback mechanism in 18 states across 6 geopolitical zones  in Nigeria. Data were obtained through interview schedules supplemented with  key informant interviews while a multi-stage sampling procedure was employed in  the selection of respondents. Firstly, eighteen (18) States where NSPRI postharvest  technologies have been disseminated and adopted were purposively selected.  Secondly, users of improved NSPRI postharvest technologies were selected from  diverse locations within the states earlier selected. Non-probabilistic techniques  particularly snowballing were also employed at this stage. Frequencies, percentages,  means and weighted averages were employed in the analysis of data components.  Results showed that 70% of respondents have never provided feedback on NSPRI  technologies. Executives of various associations was used by 45% of NSK users,  59% of IFB users, and 48% of VPC users to provide feedback while 43% of PSSD  users and 40% of HSD users shared opinions through NSPRI extension staff. In  general, there exists a strong (NSK: 94% PSSD: 95.2% IFB®: 91% HSD: 88.6% VPC:  74.5%) willingness to recommend technologies among respondents even as they  provided positive feedback on use parameters and components of the technologies.  However, respondents opined that the roller and chimney (NSK), durability of  polypropylene cover (PSSD), draining of thawed ice (IFB®), and bolted ring (HSD)  require improvement.  ","PeriodicalId":245327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education (IJRSE)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation and Special Education (IJRSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48165/ijrse.2023.3.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This inquiry is predicated on the datum or truism that all technologies have a gap  and or become obsolete at some point, and the utilization of passé technologies and  methods predisposes the agricultural sector to underdevelopment. It investigates  technological paucities and fixes for NSPRI technologies (NSPRI Smoking Kiln  (NSK), Parabolic-shaped Solar Dryer (PSSD), Ice Fish Box® (IFB®), Hermetic Steel  Drum (HSD) and Ventilated Plastic Crate (VPC)) from the perspective of users of  the technologies. The study adopted a cross-sectional research design using the in person method as its feedback mechanism in 18 states across 6 geopolitical zones  in Nigeria. Data were obtained through interview schedules supplemented with  key informant interviews while a multi-stage sampling procedure was employed in  the selection of respondents. Firstly, eighteen (18) States where NSPRI postharvest  technologies have been disseminated and adopted were purposively selected.  Secondly, users of improved NSPRI postharvest technologies were selected from  diverse locations within the states earlier selected. Non-probabilistic techniques  particularly snowballing were also employed at this stage. Frequencies, percentages,  means and weighted averages were employed in the analysis of data components.  Results showed that 70% of respondents have never provided feedback on NSPRI  technologies. Executives of various associations was used by 45% of NSK users,  59% of IFB users, and 48% of VPC users to provide feedback while 43% of PSSD  users and 40% of HSD users shared opinions through NSPRI extension staff. In  general, there exists a strong (NSK: 94% PSSD: 95.2% IFB®: 91% HSD: 88.6% VPC:  74.5%) willingness to recommend technologies among respondents even as they  provided positive feedback on use parameters and components of the technologies.  However, respondents opined that the roller and chimney (NSK), durability of  polypropylene cover (PSSD), draining of thawed ice (IFB®), and bolted ring (HSD)  require improvement.  
通过反馈加强采后技术开发与改进
这项调查是基于这样一个事实,即所有技术在某一时刻都有差距或过时,而使用过时的技术和方法使农业部门容易发展不足。它从技术用户的角度调查了NSPRI技术(NSPRI烟熏窑(NSK),抛物线形太阳能干燥器(PSSD),冰鱼箱®(IFB®),密封钢鼓(HSD)和通风塑料箱(VPC))的技术缺陷和修复方法。本研究采用横断面研究设计,在尼日利亚6个地缘政治区域的18个州采用面对面的方法作为反馈机制。数据是通过访谈时间表补充关键线人访谈获得的,而在选择受访者时采用了多阶段抽样程序。首先,有目的地选择了18个已经传播和采用NSPRI采后技术的国家。其次,改良的NSPRI采后技术的使用者是从先前选定的州内的不同地点选择的。非概率技术,特别是滚雪球,在这个阶段也被采用。数据成分分析采用频率、百分比、平均值和加权平均值。结果显示,70%的受访者从未对NSPRI技术提供过反馈。45%的NSK用户、59%的IFB用户和48%的VPC用户通过各种协会的执行人员提供反馈,而43%的PSSD用户和40%的HSD用户通过NSPRI扩展人员分享意见。总体而言,受访者(NSK: 94% PSSD: 95.2% IFB®:91% HSD: 88.6% VPC: 74.5%)推荐技术的意愿很强,即使他们对技术的使用参数和组件提供了积极的反馈。然而,受访者认为滚筒和烟囱(NSK)、聚丙烯盖(PSSD)的耐久性、融冰排水(IFB®)和螺栓环(HSD)需要改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信