The Comparison of Canopy Density Measurement Using UAV and Hemispherical Photography for Remote Sensing Based Mapping

D. Umarhadi, P. Danoedoro, P. Wicaksono, P. Widayani, Wahvu Nurbandi, A. Juniansah
{"title":"The Comparison of Canopy Density Measurement Using UAV and Hemispherical Photography for Remote Sensing Based Mapping","authors":"D. Umarhadi, P. Danoedoro, P. Wicaksono, P. Widayani, Wahvu Nurbandi, A. Juniansah","doi":"10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canopy density estimation based on the empirical method using remote sensing data needs field measurement of canopy density data. There are several methods to obtain canopy density data, and it can be divided into downward and upward measurement. Those two methods have different term used, and it is possible to produce different result. This study aims to compare aerial photography from UAV and hemispherical photography that represent downward and upward method, respectively. The results showed downward method produces the higher canopy density than upward method. The regression analysis showed upward method provides the better method in canopy density estimation, however the term of downward measurement is more appropriate to canopy density term","PeriodicalId":196768,"journal":{"name":"2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 4th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTC.2018.8528670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Canopy density estimation based on the empirical method using remote sensing data needs field measurement of canopy density data. There are several methods to obtain canopy density data, and it can be divided into downward and upward measurement. Those two methods have different term used, and it is possible to produce different result. This study aims to compare aerial photography from UAV and hemispherical photography that represent downward and upward method, respectively. The results showed downward method produces the higher canopy density than upward method. The regression analysis showed upward method provides the better method in canopy density estimation, however the term of downward measurement is more appropriate to canopy density term
基于遥感制图的无人机与半球面摄影冠层密度测量的比较
基于遥感数据的经验方法估算冠层密度需要对冠层密度数据进行实地测量。获取冠层密度数据的方法有几种,可分为向下测量和向上测量。这两种方法使用的术语不同,可能产生不同的结果。本研究的目的是比较无人机航拍和半球摄影,分别代表向下和向上的方法。结果表明,向下法比向上法获得更高的冠层密度。回归分析表明,向上测量法是估算冠层密度的较好方法,而向下测量项更适合于估算冠层密度项
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信