Validitas dan Reliabilitas Ujian Keahlian Pelaut Bahasa Inggris Maritim

Andesvan Gumay, Yohanna Nurika, Siwi Woro Herningsih, S. Magdalena
{"title":"Validitas dan Reliabilitas Ujian Keahlian Pelaut Bahasa Inggris Maritim","authors":"Andesvan Gumay, Yohanna Nurika, Siwi Woro Herningsih, S. Magdalena","doi":"10.31539/joeai.v5i2.3854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to determine the validity and reliability of the Maritime English proficiency test organized by PUKP (Seafarer Expertise Exam) 02 Banten and its surroundings. Research method was used is descriptive analysis because it aims to explain the level of difficulty, discriminatory power, as well as the validity and reliability of exam questions for 3rd grade students at the Maritime School. The results showed that there were 43 valid exam questions in the Nautical department or about 71.66% of the total questions, with a correlation value greater than Rtable 0.1071 with a significance level of 5%. As for the Engineering department, there are 41 valid exam questions or 68.33% of the total questions, with a correlation value greater than Rtable 0.2483 with a significance level of 5%. For the reliability of the test questions in the Nautical department of 0.5968 and the Engineering department 0.6789 with an interval between 0.40 to 0.70 with moderated interpretation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Maritime English exam questions used are quite valid and reliable. \n  \nKeywords: validity, reliability, proficiency test, maritime English.","PeriodicalId":120998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Instruction (JOEAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i2.3854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to determine the validity and reliability of the Maritime English proficiency test organized by PUKP (Seafarer Expertise Exam) 02 Banten and its surroundings. Research method was used is descriptive analysis because it aims to explain the level of difficulty, discriminatory power, as well as the validity and reliability of exam questions for 3rd grade students at the Maritime School. The results showed that there were 43 valid exam questions in the Nautical department or about 71.66% of the total questions, with a correlation value greater than Rtable 0.1071 with a significance level of 5%. As for the Engineering department, there are 41 valid exam questions or 68.33% of the total questions, with a correlation value greater than Rtable 0.2483 with a significance level of 5%. For the reliability of the test questions in the Nautical department of 0.5968 and the Engineering department 0.6789 with an interval between 0.40 to 0.70 with moderated interpretation. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Maritime English exam questions used are quite valid and reliable.   Keywords: validity, reliability, proficiency test, maritime English.
海上英语航海航海技能测试的有效性和可靠性
本研究的目的是确定PUKP(海员专业技能考试)02万丹及其周边地区组织的海事英语水平测试的效度和信度。研究方法是描述性分析,因为它的目的是解释难度的水平,歧视权力,以及效度和信度的考试题目在海事学校的三年级学生。结果显示,航海系有效试题43道,约占试题总数的71.66%,相关值大于Rtable 0.1071,显著性水平为5%。工程系有效试题41道,占总试题的68.33%,相关值大于Rtable 0.2483,显著性水平为5%。对于航海部门的测试题的信度为0.5968,工程部门的测试题的信度为0.6789,区间在0.40到0.70之间,解释有调节。因此,可以得出结论,海事英语考试所使用的问题是相当有效和可靠的。关键词:效度,信度,能力测试,航海英语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信