Observational Scales for Assessing Cognitive Development of Persons With Moderate (Kapp_sniu), Severe (Kapp_sniz) and Profound (Kapp_snig) Intellectual Disabilities – Characteristics of the Tool

Beata Papuda-Dolińska, Anna Błaszczak, K. Wiejak, Tomasz Knopik, G. Krasowicz-Kupis, Magdalena Łuniewska-Etenkowska, Piotr Zieliński
{"title":"Observational Scales for Assessing Cognitive Development of Persons With Moderate (Kapp_sniu), Severe (Kapp_sniz) and Profound (Kapp_snig) Intellectual Disabilities – Characteristics of the Tool","authors":"Beata Papuda-Dolińska, Anna Błaszczak, K. Wiejak, Tomasz Knopik, G. Krasowicz-Kupis, Magdalena Łuniewska-Etenkowska, Piotr Zieliński","doi":"10.17951/lrp.2023.42.2.117-133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: On the basis of education, the criterion-referenced diagnosis of the disorder does not provide sufficient grounds for planning educational and therapeutic support. The functional characteristics supplementing the data from the nosological diagnosis show the possibilities and difficulties of a person in functioning in the everyday life context. Research Aim: The aim of the article is to present observational scales for assessing the cognitive functioning of people with moderate (KAPP_SNIU), severe (KAPP_SNIZ) and profound (KAPP_SNIG) intellectual disabilities aged 6 to 25, which are part of the KAPP diagnostic battery. Evidence-based Facts: Current diagnostic instruments for the functional assessment of people with moderate, severe and profound intellectual disabilities contain outdated or non-standardized tools. In Poland, there is a need to supplement this catalogue. Summary: The scales are intended for functional assessment performed by special educators, psychologists and specialists. Theoretical assumptions on which the construction of the scales is based and the stages of this process, which included: pilot studies, standardization studies and validation studies, are presented. The psychometric properties of the scales as well as the data confirming convergent and differential validity are also described. The last chapter presenting the fields for interpretation of the results (inter-individual, intra-individual comparisons and between the parallel perspectives of the parent and teacher in the 270-degree diagnosis model) gives specialists a picture of the possibility of using tools in everyday diagnostic and therapeutic work.","PeriodicalId":258263,"journal":{"name":"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2023.42.2.117-133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: On the basis of education, the criterion-referenced diagnosis of the disorder does not provide sufficient grounds for planning educational and therapeutic support. The functional characteristics supplementing the data from the nosological diagnosis show the possibilities and difficulties of a person in functioning in the everyday life context. Research Aim: The aim of the article is to present observational scales for assessing the cognitive functioning of people with moderate (KAPP_SNIU), severe (KAPP_SNIZ) and profound (KAPP_SNIG) intellectual disabilities aged 6 to 25, which are part of the KAPP diagnostic battery. Evidence-based Facts: Current diagnostic instruments for the functional assessment of people with moderate, severe and profound intellectual disabilities contain outdated or non-standardized tools. In Poland, there is a need to supplement this catalogue. Summary: The scales are intended for functional assessment performed by special educators, psychologists and specialists. Theoretical assumptions on which the construction of the scales is based and the stages of this process, which included: pilot studies, standardization studies and validation studies, are presented. The psychometric properties of the scales as well as the data confirming convergent and differential validity are also described. The last chapter presenting the fields for interpretation of the results (inter-individual, intra-individual comparisons and between the parallel perspectives of the parent and teacher in the 270-degree diagnosis model) gives specialists a picture of the possibility of using tools in everyday diagnostic and therapeutic work.
评估中度(Kapp_sniu)、重度(Kapp_sniz)和重度(Kapp_snig)智力残疾者认知发展的观察量表-工具特征
在教育的基础上,对障碍的标准参照诊断不能为规划教育和治疗支持提供充分的依据。功能特征补充了来自分类学诊断的数据,显示了一个人在日常生活中功能的可能性和困难。研究目的:本文的目的是为6 - 25岁KAPP诊断组中中度(KAPP_SNIU)、重度(KAPP_SNIZ)和重度(KAPP_SNIG)智力障碍患者的认知功能评估提供观察量表。基于证据的事实:目前用于中度、重度和重度智力残疾者功能评估的诊断工具包含过时或非标准化的工具。在波兰,有必要补充这个目录。总结:该量表旨在由特殊教育工作者、心理学家和专家进行功能评估。介绍了编制量表所依据的理论假设和这一过程的各个阶段,其中包括:试点研究、标准化研究和验证研究。本文还介绍了量表的心理测量学性质,以及证实收敛效度和差分效度的数据。最后一章介绍了解释结果的领域(个体之间、个体内部的比较以及在270度诊断模型中父母和教师的平行视角之间的比较),为专家们提供了在日常诊断和治疗工作中使用工具的可能性的图片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信