Public Discourse Regarding Polrisesuaiprosedur Hashtag as a Trust Issue

Uliviana Restu Handaningtias, Puspita Asri Praceka, Ika Arinia Andryani
{"title":"Public Discourse Regarding Polrisesuaiprosedur Hashtag as a Trust Issue","authors":"Uliviana Restu Handaningtias, Puspita Asri Praceka, Ika Arinia Andryani","doi":"10.31014/aior.1991.05.04.385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempted to describe on how political discourse develops through social media’s hashtags. #PolriSesuaiProsedur hashtag originally appeared to quell another viral hashtag, #PercumaLaporPolisi. This study used social network analysis between multiple internet accounts to shed light on how conversations on social media can actually develop into public discourse based on the hashtag #PolriSesuaiProsedur. This research became important since it would show the extent of public’s trust in the police institution. The research would be conducted on 3 phases. First, big data analysis to see the spread of netizens' conversations related to the #PolriSesuaiProsedur hashtag. Second, a quantitative survey on 5 regencies/cities in Banten Province. Third, FGD to strengthen a comprehensive outlook related to public discussions about trust in the police. The results of the data showed that the #PolriSesuaiProsedur hashtag described an issue that was not organic and centered only on one position. The results also showed how people responded to the hashtag and produced a bubble filter effect that encouraged the emergence of homogenous opinions and behaviors in the society.","PeriodicalId":309457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social and Political Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social and Political Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.05.04.385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study attempted to describe on how political discourse develops through social media’s hashtags. #PolriSesuaiProsedur hashtag originally appeared to quell another viral hashtag, #PercumaLaporPolisi. This study used social network analysis between multiple internet accounts to shed light on how conversations on social media can actually develop into public discourse based on the hashtag #PolriSesuaiProsedur. This research became important since it would show the extent of public’s trust in the police institution. The research would be conducted on 3 phases. First, big data analysis to see the spread of netizens' conversations related to the #PolriSesuaiProsedur hashtag. Second, a quantitative survey on 5 regencies/cities in Banten Province. Third, FGD to strengthen a comprehensive outlook related to public discussions about trust in the police. The results of the data showed that the #PolriSesuaiProsedur hashtag described an issue that was not organic and centered only on one position. The results also showed how people responded to the hashtag and produced a bubble filter effect that encouraged the emergence of homogenous opinions and behaviors in the society.
公共话语中关于检察官身份标签的信任问题
本研究试图描述政治话语如何通过社交媒体的标签发展。#PolriSesuaiProsedur标签最初是为了平息另一个广为传播的标签#PercumaLaporPolisi。这项研究使用了多个互联网账户之间的社交网络分析,以揭示社交媒体上的对话如何真正发展成基于#PolriSesuaiProsedur标签的公共话语。这项研究变得很重要,因为它将显示公众对警察机构的信任程度。研究将分三个阶段进行。首先,通过大数据分析,看到网友们与#PolriSesuaiProsedur标签相关的对话传播情况。其次,对万丹省5个县/市进行了定量调查。第三,加强与公众对警察信任的讨论有关的全面展望。数据结果显示,#PolriSesuaiProsedur标签描述的问题不是有机的,只集中在一个立场上。研究结果还显示了人们对这个标签的反应,并产生了一种泡沫过滤效应,鼓励社会上出现同质化的观点和行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信