Stego image quality and the reliability of PSNR

Adel Almohammad, G. Ghinea
{"title":"Stego image quality and the reliability of PSNR","authors":"Adel Almohammad, G. Ghinea","doi":"10.1109/IPTA.2010.5586786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital image steganography is the art of hiding information in other digital images. Moreover, image quality evaluation has many difficulties such as the amount of degradation or distortion induced in the reconstructed image. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) is the most common metric used to evaluate the stego image quality. However, subjective evaluation is the most reliable method to measure the image quality. Therefore, we try to give an answer to the following question: “does the PSNR value of a stego image reflect its actual quality?”. However, JPEG steganography represents a distortion source in addition to the image compression. Therefore, this paper investigates the relationship, if there any, between the PSNR and the subjective quality of stego images. Four steganography methods and five grayscale images are used in this paper. Moreover, an adapted double stimulus continuous quality scale (DSCQS) method has been adopted. As a result, PSNR can not be reliably used because it has poor correlation with the mean opinion score (MOS). Moreover, conclusions derived from only PSNR values of different stego images are quite different from that derived from the MOS values. Additionally, MOS shows that a particular steganography method modifies different test images quality in different ways.","PeriodicalId":236574,"journal":{"name":"2010 2nd International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 2nd International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPTA.2010.5586786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

Digital image steganography is the art of hiding information in other digital images. Moreover, image quality evaluation has many difficulties such as the amount of degradation or distortion induced in the reconstructed image. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) is the most common metric used to evaluate the stego image quality. However, subjective evaluation is the most reliable method to measure the image quality. Therefore, we try to give an answer to the following question: “does the PSNR value of a stego image reflect its actual quality?”. However, JPEG steganography represents a distortion source in addition to the image compression. Therefore, this paper investigates the relationship, if there any, between the PSNR and the subjective quality of stego images. Four steganography methods and five grayscale images are used in this paper. Moreover, an adapted double stimulus continuous quality scale (DSCQS) method has been adopted. As a result, PSNR can not be reliably used because it has poor correlation with the mean opinion score (MOS). Moreover, conclusions derived from only PSNR values of different stego images are quite different from that derived from the MOS values. Additionally, MOS shows that a particular steganography method modifies different test images quality in different ways.
隐波图像质量与PSNR的可靠性
数字图像隐写术是将信息隐藏在其他数字图像中的技术。此外,图像质量评估存在许多困难,如在重建图像中引起的退化或畸变的数量。峰值信噪比(PSNR)是评价隐进图像质量最常用的指标。然而,主观评价是衡量图像质量最可靠的方法。因此,我们试图回答以下问题:“隐去图像的PSNR值是否反映了其实际质量?”但是,JPEG隐写除了对图像进行压缩外,还代表了一个失真源。因此,本文研究隐写图像的PSNR与主观质量之间的关系。本文采用了四种隐写方法和五种灰度图像。此外,还采用了自适应双刺激连续质量量表(DSCQS)方法。结果,由于PSNR与平均意见评分(MOS)相关性较差,不能可靠地使用。此外,仅从不同隐写图像的PSNR值得出的结论与从MOS值得出的结论存在较大差异。此外,MOS表明,特定的隐写方法以不同的方式修改不同的测试图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信