Comparison and Analysis of Building Fire Risk Assessment Methods

Lizhi Wu, Shigang Guo
{"title":"Comparison and Analysis of Building Fire Risk Assessment Methods","authors":"Lizhi Wu, Shigang Guo","doi":"10.1109/ICSRS.2018.8688723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the rapid development of the global economy, the building fire prevention design must transform from the traditional “prescription” design to the scientific safety engineering design at the technical level, and the core of the transformation is fire risk assessment. In this paper, various building fire risk assessment methods were divided into three categories: qualitative methods, semi-quantitative methods and quantitative methods. By comparing different methods from the sphere of application, considerations, representation of results, subjectivity of results, advantages, disadvantages and so on. Finally, the conclusion of how to choose the building fire risk assessment method and next research orientation can be drawn.","PeriodicalId":166131,"journal":{"name":"2018 3rd International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 3rd International Conference on System Reliability and Safety (ICSRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSRS.2018.8688723","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid development of the global economy, the building fire prevention design must transform from the traditional “prescription” design to the scientific safety engineering design at the technical level, and the core of the transformation is fire risk assessment. In this paper, various building fire risk assessment methods were divided into three categories: qualitative methods, semi-quantitative methods and quantitative methods. By comparing different methods from the sphere of application, considerations, representation of results, subjectivity of results, advantages, disadvantages and so on. Finally, the conclusion of how to choose the building fire risk assessment method and next research orientation can be drawn.
建筑火灾风险评估方法的比较与分析
随着全球经济的快速发展,建筑防火设计在技术层面上必须从传统的“处方式”设计向科学的安全工程设计转变,而这种转变的核心是火灾风险评估。本文将各种建筑火灾风险评估方法分为定性方法、半定量方法和定量方法三大类。从适用范围、考虑因素、结果表现形式、结果主观性、优缺点等方面对不同方法进行了比较。最后,对建筑火灾风险评估方法的选择和下一步的研究方向进行了总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信