Effect of Uniform Color on Outcome of Match at Senior World Wrestling Championships 2015

D. Curby
{"title":"Effect of Uniform Color on Outcome of Match at Senior World Wrestling Championships 2015","authors":"D. Curby","doi":"10.1080/21615667.2016.1210266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Published research after the 2004 Olympic Games indicated that in the combat sports of boxing, taekwondo, Greco-Roman wrestling, and freestyle wrestling, the combatants in red won more often than those in blue in each sport. This prompted several subsequent studies, including team sports, the role of judges and officials, and other factors that could contribute to a unfair bias against what is thought to be a random and benign assignment of uniform color. To further examine a possible competitive bias in wrestling because of uniform color, this study examined the results from the 2015 Senior World Wrestling Championships. The results of all 952 bouts, women’s freestyle, Greco-Roman, and freestyle were reviewed, and the color associated with either winning or losing (red or blue) was recorded. A total of 458 winners wore red and 494 wore blue. These data were then assembled in a 2 × 2 contingency table for chi square analysis (χ2) I used the Greek symbol- χ2 χ2 statistic was = 2.7227 and p = .098931. This result is not significant at p < .05, indicating that there was no relation between the color of the uniform and the match outcome.","PeriodicalId":387289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Wrestling Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Wrestling Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21615667.2016.1210266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Published research after the 2004 Olympic Games indicated that in the combat sports of boxing, taekwondo, Greco-Roman wrestling, and freestyle wrestling, the combatants in red won more often than those in blue in each sport. This prompted several subsequent studies, including team sports, the role of judges and officials, and other factors that could contribute to a unfair bias against what is thought to be a random and benign assignment of uniform color. To further examine a possible competitive bias in wrestling because of uniform color, this study examined the results from the 2015 Senior World Wrestling Championships. The results of all 952 bouts, women’s freestyle, Greco-Roman, and freestyle were reviewed, and the color associated with either winning or losing (red or blue) was recorded. A total of 458 winners wore red and 494 wore blue. These data were then assembled in a 2 × 2 contingency table for chi square analysis (χ2) I used the Greek symbol- χ2 χ2 statistic was = 2.7227 and p = .098931. This result is not significant at p < .05, indicating that there was no relation between the color of the uniform and the match outcome.
2015年世界高级摔跤锦标赛统一颜色对比赛结果的影响
2004年奥运会后发表的研究表明,在拳击、跆拳道、古典式摔跤和自由式摔跤等格斗项目中,穿红色衣服的选手比穿蓝色衣服的选手获胜的几率更高。这引发了随后的几项研究,包括团队运动、裁判和官员的角色,以及其他可能导致对被认为是随机和良性的统一颜色分配产生不公平偏见的因素。为了进一步研究由于颜色统一可能导致的摔跤比赛偏见,本研究检查了2015年高级世界摔跤锦标赛的结果。回顾了952场比赛的结果,包括女子自由泳、古典式和自由泳,并记录了与胜利或失败相关的颜色(红色或蓝色)。共有458名获胜者穿红色衣服,494名获胜者穿蓝色衣服。然后将这些数据组装在2 × 2列联表中进行卡方分析(χ2)。我使用希腊符号- χ2 χ2统计量= 2.7227,p = .098931。这一结果在p < 0.05时不显著,说明制服的颜色与比赛结果没有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信