A PERSON`S DIGNITY IN SECULAR AND ORTHODOX CONCEPTS

M. Kostenko
{"title":"A PERSON`S DIGNITY IN SECULAR AND ORTHODOX CONCEPTS","authors":"M. Kostenko","doi":"10.33989/2075-1443.2023.47.282595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the dignity of a person in secular and Orthodox aspects. The authors argue that every phenomenon of the material and spiritual world is objectively inherent in internal contradictions, so it is not an exception and an idea of human dignity in secular and religious contexts. The research methods are comprehensive and based on the philosophical, anthropological and philosophical and cultural analysis of human dignity in secular and Orthodox dimensions. Discussion. The concepts of «secular» (universal) and «Christian» morality are characterized and distinguished. The authors argue that the latter comes from a supernatural source, from a moral law, the basis of which is the belief in the immortality of the human spirit. Christian morality provides such norms of behavior of people in which the biblical moral commandments are observed.The roots of the universal morality are in a culture that has produced a humanistic outlook, within which a person is recognized as self -sufficient value, capable of asserting his dignity, transforming himself and the world without the intervention of a transcendental super -sensory nature (God). The universal morality is the principles and norms that regulate the behavior of people, the activities of their communities, associations in terms of universally recognized ideas about good and evil, honesty and disobedience, honesty and dishonesty. Finally, the article suggests that, despite the differences, and sometimes contradictions in the understanding of the essential manifestations of human dignity between secular and Christian contexts, quite obvious to both aspects is the understanding that the leading place should be occupied by the personality that manifests itself manifestation and individual aspiration, in the depths of its own consciousness and in its desire for free self -determination and creativity, as a prerequisite for the affirmation of one’s dignity.","PeriodicalId":137741,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Horizons","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33989/2075-1443.2023.47.282595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the dignity of a person in secular and Orthodox aspects. The authors argue that every phenomenon of the material and spiritual world is objectively inherent in internal contradictions, so it is not an exception and an idea of human dignity in secular and religious contexts. The research methods are comprehensive and based on the philosophical, anthropological and philosophical and cultural analysis of human dignity in secular and Orthodox dimensions. Discussion. The concepts of «secular» (universal) and «Christian» morality are characterized and distinguished. The authors argue that the latter comes from a supernatural source, from a moral law, the basis of which is the belief in the immortality of the human spirit. Christian morality provides such norms of behavior of people in which the biblical moral commandments are observed.The roots of the universal morality are in a culture that has produced a humanistic outlook, within which a person is recognized as self -sufficient value, capable of asserting his dignity, transforming himself and the world without the intervention of a transcendental super -sensory nature (God). The universal morality is the principles and norms that regulate the behavior of people, the activities of their communities, associations in terms of universally recognized ideas about good and evil, honesty and disobedience, honesty and dishonesty. Finally, the article suggests that, despite the differences, and sometimes contradictions in the understanding of the essential manifestations of human dignity between secular and Christian contexts, quite obvious to both aspects is the understanding that the leading place should be occupied by the personality that manifests itself manifestation and individual aspiration, in the depths of its own consciousness and in its desire for free self -determination and creativity, as a prerequisite for the affirmation of one’s dignity.
一个人在世俗和正统观念中的尊严
本文从世俗和东正教两方面分析了人的尊严。作者认为,物质世界和精神世界的每一种现象客观上都是内在矛盾所固有的,因此它不是一种例外,也不是世俗和宗教语境中的人的尊严观念。研究方法是全面的,以哲学、人类学、哲学和文化分析为基础,从世俗和东正教的角度对人类尊严进行分析。讨论。“世俗”(普遍)和“基督教”道德的概念是有特点和区别的。作者认为后者来自一种超自然的来源,来自一种道德法则,其基础是对人类精神不朽的信仰。基督教道德为人们提供了遵守圣经道德戒律的行为规范。普遍道德的根源是一种产生了人文主义观的文化,在这种文化中,一个人被认为是自给自足的价值,能够维护他的尊严,改变自己和世界,而不需要超然的超感官自然(上帝)的干预。普遍道德是规范人们行为的原则和规范,他们的社区活动,根据普遍认可的关于善与恶,诚实与不服从,诚实与不诚实的观念。最后,文章指出,尽管在世俗和基督教背景之间对人的尊严的基本表现形式的理解存在差异,有时甚至是矛盾,但双方都很明显地认识到,在其自身意识的深处,在其对自由自决和创造的渴望中,表现自己的表现形式和个人愿望的人格应该占据主导地位。作为肯定个人尊严的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信