Triple Logic Analysis of Rural revitalization Strategy from the Perspective of New Era

Abstract

The strategy of Rural Revitalization is an important part of Xi Jinping's socialist thoughts of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the new era. The strategy of Rural Revitalization is also the latest theoretical achievement of the localization of Marxism in China, which opens a new chapter of the countryside development of the sinicization of Marxism in China. Taking advantages of the great power of the Nineteenth CPC National Congress and the great changes required by the times,the strategy of Rural Revitalization proceeds from realistic logic, theoretical logic and practical logic, pushing the development of "agriculture, countryside and farmers" to a new height unprecedented in history, seeking to resolutely win the battle against poverty, building a well-off society in an allround way and realize the Chinese dream ofgreat rejuvenation.The layout is based on strategically thinking in a strategically orientedway to understand the development trend of the countryside in the new era. Therefore, we should deeply understand the triple logic of the strategy of rural revitalization, so as to start a new journey of accelerating the modernization of agricultural and rural areas in China with more pragmatic, open and scientific methods. 新时代视域下乡村振兴战略的三重逻辑论析 冯莎 ,陈茂华 ,李沙沙 3 :绵阳师范学院 马克思主义学院,绵阳,四川,中国 关键词:乡村振兴战略;现实逻辑;理论逻辑;实践逻辑 中文摘要:乡村振兴战略是习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的重要组成部分,同时也是马 克思主义中国化的最新理论成果,开辟了中国化马克思主义乡村发展新篇章。乘十九大东风之 伟力,顺时代要求之巨变,乡村振兴战略从现实逻辑、理论逻辑和实践逻辑出发,将“三农”发 展推向历史前所未有的新高度,为坚决打赢脱贫攻坚战、全面建成小康社会、实现中华民族伟 大复兴的中国梦而谋篇布局,以高屋建瓴的战略思维深专悟透新时代乡村的发展趋势。因此, 我们要深刻理解乡村振兴战略的三重逻辑,以更加务实、开放和科学的工作方法开启加快我国 农业农村现代化的新征程。 1.引言 十九大提出的乡村振兴战略是新时代视域下的理论成果,是密切结合我国基本国情和时代发 展状况的产物。该战略以“三农”问题为总抓手,“二十字总要求”为具体内涵,依托“农业 农村现代化”为发展目标和“两个一百年”奋斗目标,来驱动和跟进新时代中国特色社会主义 2nd International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2019) Copyright © 2019, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 369