Bibliometric indicators and decision making

Fernando Ledesma, Beltrán Enrique Malave González
{"title":"Bibliometric indicators and decision making","authors":"Fernando Ledesma, Beltrán Enrique Malave González","doi":"10.56294/10.56294/dm20229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the publication of scientific articles, a fundamental link within the research process, has become the standard unit that allows for the assessment of the quality of the knowledge generation process and its impact on the scientific environment. This article aims to describe the general aspects of the relationship between bibliometric studies and decision-making. Data on scientific activities are increasingly being used to govern science. Research evaluations that were once individually designed for their specific context and conducted by peers are now routine and based on metrics. The issue is that the evaluation has shifted from being based on expert assessments to relying on these metrics. The opportunity to apply bibliometric techniques proves useful when making decisions that involve a redirection of all research-development plans and the selection of capable leaders to coordinate projects with the purpose of generating technological and financial resources.","PeriodicalId":388306,"journal":{"name":"Data & Metadata","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data & Metadata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56294/10.56294/dm20229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The analysis of the publication of scientific articles, a fundamental link within the research process, has become the standard unit that allows for the assessment of the quality of the knowledge generation process and its impact on the scientific environment. This article aims to describe the general aspects of the relationship between bibliometric studies and decision-making. Data on scientific activities are increasingly being used to govern science. Research evaluations that were once individually designed for their specific context and conducted by peers are now routine and based on metrics. The issue is that the evaluation has shifted from being based on expert assessments to relying on these metrics. The opportunity to apply bibliometric techniques proves useful when making decisions that involve a redirection of all research-development plans and the selection of capable leaders to coordinate projects with the purpose of generating technological and financial resources.
文献计量指标和决策
对科学论文发表的分析是研究过程中的一个基本环节,它已成为评估知识产生过程的质量及其对科学环境的影响的标准单位。本文旨在描述文献计量学研究与决策之间关系的一般方面。科学活动的数据越来越多地被用来管理科学。研究评估曾经是针对其具体情况单独设计的,由同行进行,现在是常规的,并基于指标。问题是评估已经从基于专家评估转向依赖这些指标。应用文献计量学技术的机会在作出涉及所有研究发展计划的重新定向和选择有能力的领导人以协调项目以产生技术和财政资源的决定时证明是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信