Productivity in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study

Sandra L. Ram�rez-Mora, H. Oktaba
{"title":"Productivity in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Mapping Study","authors":"Sandra L. Ram�rez-Mora, H. Oktaba","doi":"10.1109/CONISOFT.2017.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many organizations dedicated to software development have adopted agile principles with the aim of increasing their productivity. Agile Software Development (ASD) encourages the delivery of working software frequently; however, there are many factors that affect productivity in that context. The objective of this paper is to analyze the research works about productivity in ASD to identify: the factors that affect productivity, the most used research methods, the most studied productivity levels, the concepts related to productivity, the most studied agile methodologies, and the use of productivity metrics in ASD. To perform such analysis, we conducted a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) in which we included 25 primary studies. As result of the SMS, we identified the main factors that affect productivity in ASD and the context in which the included primary studies were performed. We found that Case Study was the most used research method, and interviews and questionnaires are widely used as data collection methods. We found that most of the reported factors affecting productivity in ASD are related to agile teams, and although quality should be related to productivity, it was not considered in all studies.","PeriodicalId":357557,"journal":{"name":"2017 5th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 5th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONISOFT.2017.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Many organizations dedicated to software development have adopted agile principles with the aim of increasing their productivity. Agile Software Development (ASD) encourages the delivery of working software frequently; however, there are many factors that affect productivity in that context. The objective of this paper is to analyze the research works about productivity in ASD to identify: the factors that affect productivity, the most used research methods, the most studied productivity levels, the concepts related to productivity, the most studied agile methodologies, and the use of productivity metrics in ASD. To perform such analysis, we conducted a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) in which we included 25 primary studies. As result of the SMS, we identified the main factors that affect productivity in ASD and the context in which the included primary studies were performed. We found that Case Study was the most used research method, and interviews and questionnaires are widely used as data collection methods. We found that most of the reported factors affecting productivity in ASD are related to agile teams, and although quality should be related to productivity, it was not considered in all studies.
敏捷软件开发中的生产力:一个系统的映射研究
许多致力于软件开发的组织都采用了敏捷原则,目的是提高他们的生产力。敏捷软件开发(ASD)鼓励频繁地交付工作软件;然而,在这种情况下,有许多因素会影响生产力。本文的目的是分析关于ASD中生产力的研究工作,以确定:影响生产力的因素,最常用的研究方法,研究最多的生产力水平,与生产力相关的概念,研究最多的敏捷方法,以及在ASD中生产力指标的使用。为了进行这样的分析,我们进行了一项系统测绘研究(SMS),其中包括25项主要研究。作为SMS的结果,我们确定了影响ASD生产力的主要因素以及所包括的主要研究进行的背景。我们发现案例研究是最常用的研究方法,访谈和问卷调查是广泛使用的数据收集方法。我们发现,大多数报道的影响ASD生产力的因素都与敏捷团队有关,尽管质量应该与生产力有关,但并没有在所有研究中都考虑到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信