Issues on decentralized consistency checking of multi-lateral collaborations

A. Wombacher
{"title":"Issues on decentralized consistency checking of multi-lateral collaborations","authors":"A. Wombacher","doi":"10.1109/WETICE.2005.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decentralized consistency checking of multi-lateral collaborations is based on propagating local information to trading partners until a fixed point has been reached. However, which information has to be propagated and how to represent this information is a challenge, because the local consistency decisions should derive consistency only if the collaboration is consistent. In this paper, two scenarios are discussed arguing that history information about reaching a state must be propagated and that messages must be named uniquely in this history information to achieve the aimed equivalence of local consistency and collaboration consistency.","PeriodicalId":128074,"journal":{"name":"14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise (WETICE'05)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise (WETICE'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2005.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Decentralized consistency checking of multi-lateral collaborations is based on propagating local information to trading partners until a fixed point has been reached. However, which information has to be propagated and how to represent this information is a challenge, because the local consistency decisions should derive consistency only if the collaboration is consistent. In this paper, two scenarios are discussed arguing that history information about reaching a state must be propagated and that messages must be named uniquely in this history information to achieve the aimed equivalence of local consistency and collaboration consistency.
多边合作分散一致性检查问题
多边合作的分散一致性检查是基于向贸易伙伴传播本地信息,直到达到一个固定点。然而,必须传播哪些信息以及如何表示这些信息是一个挑战,因为只有在协作一致的情况下,本地一致性决策才应该获得一致性。本文讨论了两种场景,认为必须传播关于达到某个状态的历史信息,并且必须在该历史信息中唯一地命名消息,以实现局部一致性和协作一致性的目标等价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信