USE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY MODELS AS A EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT RISK MATURITY ASSESSMENT

Adam Faifr
{"title":"USE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY MODELS AS A EVALUATION FRAMEWORK FOR PROJECT RISK MATURITY ASSESSMENT","authors":"Adam Faifr","doi":"10.7441/dokbat.2020.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Management of project risks has a significant impact on the success of the entire project. The importance of project risk management also means the need for continuous measurement and development of this area. Considering the existence of few specialized maturity models for this area, the aim of this paper is to analyse the extent to which it is possible to use commonly used project management maturity models (PMMMs) as a full-fledged tool for the evaluation of project risk management maturity. Based on the literature review and selected methodology, the four most frequently used models of maturity (CMMI-DEV, OPM3, PMMM, KPMMM) are analysed in more detail. Despite the predominantly exploratory nature of this paper, based on four defined criteria, three of the above PMMMs can also be used as models for evaluating and improving Project Risk Management. While one of the outputs of this paper is the creation of an evaluation scale for the PRM assessment, based on the regularities of the models used. By outlining the possibility of using already existing PMMMs, the results of this paper contribute to the evolving field of improving the management of project risks as a key project management area. In addition, results point out the expanded use of already existing PMMMs.","PeriodicalId":270382,"journal":{"name":"DOKBAT 2020 - 16th International Bata Conference for Ph.D. Students and Young Researchers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DOKBAT 2020 - 16th International Bata Conference for Ph.D. Students and Young Researchers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7441/dokbat.2020.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Management of project risks has a significant impact on the success of the entire project. The importance of project risk management also means the need for continuous measurement and development of this area. Considering the existence of few specialized maturity models for this area, the aim of this paper is to analyse the extent to which it is possible to use commonly used project management maturity models (PMMMs) as a full-fledged tool for the evaluation of project risk management maturity. Based on the literature review and selected methodology, the four most frequently used models of maturity (CMMI-DEV, OPM3, PMMM, KPMMM) are analysed in more detail. Despite the predominantly exploratory nature of this paper, based on four defined criteria, three of the above PMMMs can also be used as models for evaluating and improving Project Risk Management. While one of the outputs of this paper is the creation of an evaluation scale for the PRM assessment, based on the regularities of the models used. By outlining the possibility of using already existing PMMMs, the results of this paper contribute to the evolving field of improving the management of project risks as a key project management area. In addition, results point out the expanded use of already existing PMMMs.
使用项目管理成熟度模型作为项目风险成熟度评估的评估框架
项目风险的管理对整个项目的成功有着重要的影响。项目风险管理的重要性也意味着需要对这一领域进行持续的度量和开发。考虑到这一领域很少有专门的成熟度模型,本文的目的是分析使用常用的项目管理成熟度模型(PMMMs)作为评估项目风险管理成熟度的成熟工具的可能性。基于文献综述和选择的方法,对四种最常用的成熟度模型(CMMI-DEV, OPM3, PMMM, KPMMM)进行了更详细的分析。尽管本文主要是探索性的,但基于四个定义的标准,上述pmmm中的三个也可以用作评估和改进项目风险管理的模型。而本文的输出之一是基于所使用模型的规律性,为PRM评估创建了一个评估尺度。通过概述使用现有pmmm的可能性,本文的结果有助于将改进项目风险管理作为一个关键的项目管理领域。此外,结果还指出了现有pmmm的扩大使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信