Confronting Aerotowing Experts With a New Phase-of-Flight Taxonomy for Towplanes

Christoph G. Santel
{"title":"Confronting Aerotowing Experts With a New Phase-of-Flight Taxonomy for Towplanes","authors":"Christoph G. Santel","doi":"10.1027/2192-0923/a000241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: While designing an automated flight control system for aerotowing gliders, engineers realized that no suitable phase-of-flight taxonomy was available for performing a functional hazard assessment. As first experiences with a custom taxonomy were gathered, questions arose on how reproducible these results were and whether they could be applied to aerotow-related tasks outside the systems engineering domain. Inter-rater agreement, as one key metric of the taxonomy, was investigated by having 13 experts on aerotowing rate a total of 30 scenarios that are presented as photographs, video sequences, and textual narratives. Agreement between experts was substantial across these types of media. The remaining sources of disagreement were found to be of little practical relevance during real-world application of the aerotowing taxonomy.","PeriodicalId":121896,"journal":{"name":"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2192-0923/a000241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: While designing an automated flight control system for aerotowing gliders, engineers realized that no suitable phase-of-flight taxonomy was available for performing a functional hazard assessment. As first experiences with a custom taxonomy were gathered, questions arose on how reproducible these results were and whether they could be applied to aerotow-related tasks outside the systems engineering domain. Inter-rater agreement, as one key metric of the taxonomy, was investigated by having 13 experts on aerotowing rate a total of 30 scenarios that are presented as photographs, video sequences, and textual narratives. Agreement between experts was substantial across these types of media. The remaining sources of disagreement were found to be of little practical relevance during real-world application of the aerotowing taxonomy.
面对拖曳专家与拖曳飞机的新的飞行阶段分类
摘要:在设计航空拖曳滑翔机自动飞行控制系统时,工程师们意识到没有合适的飞行阶段分类来进行功能危害评估。随着首次使用自定义分类法的经验的收集,问题出现了,这些结果的可重复性如何,以及它们是否可以应用于系统工程领域之外的航空相关任务。作为分类的一个关键指标,评估者之间的一致性通过13位航空拖曳专家对总共30种场景进行了调查,这些场景以照片、视频序列和文本叙述的形式呈现。在这些类型的媒体中,专家之间的意见非常一致。在航空拖曳分类的实际应用中,发现分歧的其余来源几乎没有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信