Rousseau i 2012: De-konstrueret og re-konstrueret

Thyge Tegtmejer
{"title":"Rousseau i 2012: De-konstrueret og re-konstrueret","authors":"Thyge Tegtmejer","doi":"10.7146/SPF.V2I1.6263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What will become of Rousseau when read in a non-transcendent way, as a line of some of the most prominent contemporary theorists of the philosophy of education would suggest as inevitable? To answer this question, the position and analytical tools of Jacques Derrida are clarified, and Rousseau’s “Emile ou De l’education” is read non-transcendentally, which implies a challenge and a deconstruction of the way Rousseau has built the argument for his educational project. The article concludes with a critical discussion of its own method, and challenges the asserted unavoidability of the deconstructive readings of Rousseau’s text","PeriodicalId":256798,"journal":{"name":"Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/SPF.V2I1.6263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What will become of Rousseau when read in a non-transcendent way, as a line of some of the most prominent contemporary theorists of the philosophy of education would suggest as inevitable? To answer this question, the position and analytical tools of Jacques Derrida are clarified, and Rousseau’s “Emile ou De l’education” is read non-transcendentally, which implies a challenge and a deconstruction of the way Rousseau has built the argument for his educational project. The article concludes with a critical discussion of its own method, and challenges the asserted unavoidability of the deconstructive readings of Rousseau’s text
如果以一种非先验的方式来解读卢梭,就像一些当代最杰出的教育哲学理论家所建议的那样,卢梭会变成什么?为了回答这个问题,我们澄清了雅克·德里达的立场和分析工具,并非先验地解读了卢梭的《教育的埃米尔》,这意味着对卢梭为其教育计划建立论点的方式的挑战和解构。文章最后对自己的方法进行了批判性的讨论,并挑战了对卢梭文本的解构解读所宣称的不可避免性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信