Controlling the Narrative

R. Littlefield
{"title":"Controlling the Narrative","authors":"R. Littlefield","doi":"10.1002/9781119751809.CH16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The talking points of the Administration reflected a range of narratives that sharply contrasted with objective scientific facts and assessments presented by members of the scientific and public health communities. The theoretical framework describes the rational world and narrative paradigms;truth and credibility in decision-making;and the convergence of “fake news, \" counternarratives, and conspiracy theories as they reveal the tensions between science and politics. Reliance on science as a basis for making sound policy decisions generally has prevailed, with a few exceptions. Due to mainstream media’s depiction of the pandemic as apocalyptic, a counternarrative to the primary narrative emerged, supporting the recommendations of public health officials and scientific experts. President Trump’s narratives outlining potential treatment for COVID-19 ran counter to science. The chapter offers examples of key themes and mixed messages to illustrate the conflicting positions, followed by discussion and directions for future research. © 2021 John Wiley and Sons Inc.","PeriodicalId":365562,"journal":{"name":"Communicating Science in Times of Crisis","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicating Science in Times of Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119751809.CH16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The talking points of the Administration reflected a range of narratives that sharply contrasted with objective scientific facts and assessments presented by members of the scientific and public health communities. The theoretical framework describes the rational world and narrative paradigms;truth and credibility in decision-making;and the convergence of “fake news, " counternarratives, and conspiracy theories as they reveal the tensions between science and politics. Reliance on science as a basis for making sound policy decisions generally has prevailed, with a few exceptions. Due to mainstream media’s depiction of the pandemic as apocalyptic, a counternarrative to the primary narrative emerged, supporting the recommendations of public health officials and scientific experts. President Trump’s narratives outlining potential treatment for COVID-19 ran counter to science. The chapter offers examples of key themes and mixed messages to illustrate the conflicting positions, followed by discussion and directions for future research. © 2021 John Wiley and Sons Inc.
控制叙事
行政当局的谈话要点反映了一系列与科学和公共卫生界成员提出的客观科学事实和评估形成鲜明对比的叙述。该理论框架描述了理性世界和叙事范式;决策中的真相和可信度;以及“假新闻”、反叙事和阴谋论的融合,因为它们揭示了科学与政治之间的紧张关系。除了少数例外,普遍依赖科学作为制定合理政策的基础。由于主流媒体将大流行描述为世界末日,出现了一种与主要叙述相反的叙述,支持公共卫生官员和科学专家的建议。特朗普总统概述COVID-19潜在治疗方法的叙述与科学背道而驰。本章提供了关键主题和混合信息的例子,以说明相互冲突的立场,随后是讨论和未来研究的方向。©2021 John Wiley and Sons Inc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信