A lengthwise comparative study of different versions of Yadam: Based on “Ok So-seon”

K. Kwon, W. Choi, Dong-Keon Kim
{"title":"A lengthwise comparative study of different versions of Yadam: Based on “Ok So-seon”","authors":"K. Kwon, W. Choi, Dong-Keon Kim","doi":"10.20516/classic.2022.57.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study uses lengthwise measurement of literary text using digital tools to classify various versions of the series ”The Story of Ok So-seon.” Although there have been several attempts at analyzing the development process or variation pattern of “The Story of Ok So-seon,” this study applies a new methodology to compare different versions of Yadam rather than denying earlier results or revealing new aspects. Therefore, the focus was on objectively corroborating existing studies and revealing new possibilities. First, the distances between different versions were measured and visualized as a check on earlier discussion through character unit sequence comparison and comparison of semantic types for each paragraph. As examined, the series classification of “The Story of Ok So-seon” was similar to that previous studies, and the cause of the difference was also a part that could be interpreted in the development process of Yadamsa Temple. However, in terms of disclosure, it was found that this study within the same series was relatively insufficient. This may be because there is no significant difference in narrative, although it was observed that objective and quantitative research of the literary summation series, which occupies a large proportion of Yadam’s history, is needed. If multiple Yadam books are examined, inevitable mistakes and inefficiencies are introduced into human processing capacity. However, until now, most studies of Yadam have been conducted following traditional humanities methods. While acknowledging their strengths, attempts to explore new possibilities should also be made. This can lead to visualizing the actual compartments and relationships of the Yadam enjoyment pattern in the future, and the horizon of research on the different versions of Yadam can be expanded using the research methodology of a new era of digital humanities. \n","PeriodicalId":196633,"journal":{"name":"The Research of the Korean Classic","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Research of the Korean Classic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20516/classic.2022.57.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study uses lengthwise measurement of literary text using digital tools to classify various versions of the series ”The Story of Ok So-seon.” Although there have been several attempts at analyzing the development process or variation pattern of “The Story of Ok So-seon,” this study applies a new methodology to compare different versions of Yadam rather than denying earlier results or revealing new aspects. Therefore, the focus was on objectively corroborating existing studies and revealing new possibilities. First, the distances between different versions were measured and visualized as a check on earlier discussion through character unit sequence comparison and comparison of semantic types for each paragraph. As examined, the series classification of “The Story of Ok So-seon” was similar to that previous studies, and the cause of the difference was also a part that could be interpreted in the development process of Yadamsa Temple. However, in terms of disclosure, it was found that this study within the same series was relatively insufficient. This may be because there is no significant difference in narrative, although it was observed that objective and quantitative research of the literary summation series, which occupies a large proportion of Yadam’s history, is needed. If multiple Yadam books are examined, inevitable mistakes and inefficiencies are introduced into human processing capacity. However, until now, most studies of Yadam have been conducted following traditional humanities methods. While acknowledging their strengths, attempts to explore new possibilities should also be made. This can lead to visualizing the actual compartments and relationships of the Yadam enjoyment pattern in the future, and the horizon of research on the different versions of Yadam can be expanded using the research methodology of a new era of digital humanities.
《雅旦》不同版本纵向比较研究——以《玉素仙》为例
本研究使用数字工具对文学文本进行纵向测量,对“玉素善的故事”系列的各种版本进行分类。虽然对《玉素善的故事》的发展过程或变化模式进行了多次分析,但此次研究并没有否定以前的结果或揭示新的方面,而是采用了新的方法来比较不同版本的《亚旦》。因此,重点是客观地证实现有的研究和揭示新的可能性。首先,通过字符单元序列比较和每个段落的语义类型比较,测量和可视化不同版本之间的距离,作为对前面讨论的检查。从研究结果来看,《玉素善传》的系列分类与之前的研究相似,而造成差异的原因也可以从雅音寺的发展过程中加以解释。然而,在披露方面,发现本研究在同一系列内相对不足。这可能是因为在叙事上没有明显的差异,尽管观察到需要对占据亚达姆历史很大比例的文学总结系列进行客观和定量的研究。如果检查多本yamam书籍,不可避免的错误和效率低下就会引入到人类的处理能力中。然而,到目前为止,对雅典堂的研究大多采用传统的人文方法。在承认其优势的同时,也应尝试探索新的可能性。这可以在未来将雅达姆享受模式的实际间隔和关系可视化,并且可以使用数字人文新时代的研究方法扩展对雅达姆不同版本的研究视野。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信