Efficiency analysis of model-based review in actual software design

H. Furusawa, Eun-Hye Choi, Hiroshi Watanabe
{"title":"Efficiency analysis of model-based review in actual software design","authors":"H. Furusawa, Eun-Hye Choi, Hiroshi Watanabe","doi":"10.1145/1134285.1134372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we quantitatively analyze the efficiency of the Model-Based Review (MBR) method in an actual software design from the two points of view; cost and reviewability. The MBR method is a modeling procedure for the purpose of reviewing preliminary design specifications of web-based applications. We have collected process data in applying both of the MBR method and an ordinary review to a preliminary design of a developing web-based library system. Analyzing the collected process data, we quantitatively compare the efficiency of the MBR method and that of the ordinary review. As a result of this comparative analysis, we show that the MBR method is superior to the ordinary review in terms of not only reviewability but also cost through the experimental design process.","PeriodicalId":246572,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we quantitatively analyze the efficiency of the Model-Based Review (MBR) method in an actual software design from the two points of view; cost and reviewability. The MBR method is a modeling procedure for the purpose of reviewing preliminary design specifications of web-based applications. We have collected process data in applying both of the MBR method and an ordinary review to a preliminary design of a developing web-based library system. Analyzing the collected process data, we quantitatively compare the efficiency of the MBR method and that of the ordinary review. As a result of this comparative analysis, we show that the MBR method is superior to the ordinary review in terms of not only reviewability but also cost through the experimental design process.
基于模型的评审在实际软件设计中的效率分析
本文从两个角度定量分析了基于模型的评审(MBR)方法在实际软件设计中的有效性;成本和可评审性。MBR方法是一种建模过程,用于审查基于web的应用程序的初步设计规范。我们收集了应用MBR方法和普通审查的过程数据,以初步设计一个正在开发的基于web的图书馆系统。通过对收集到的工艺数据的分析,定量比较了MBR法与普通评审法的效率。结果表明,通过实验设计过程,MBR方法不仅在可评审性方面优于普通评审方法,而且在成本方面也优于普通评审方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信