A Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale

Duygu Murat Öztürk
{"title":"A Validity and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale","authors":"Duygu Murat Öztürk","doi":"10.54803/sauhsd.1197456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The focus of the study is women's experiences of autonomy while making decisions about their care during pregnancy, labour and birth. The aim of this study is to adapt the Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale (MADM), developed by Vedam et al. in 2017, into Turkish health care culture. \nMethods: The survey was conducted May 15th to August 15th 2019. 344 women participated in the study and 286 women answered the questionnaire in total. The data were evaluated using the SPSS package software. Findings related to construct validity of the scale were made using exploratory factor analysis method. \nResults: Reliability of the Turkish form of the scale was performed with Cronbach’s Alfa and the internal consistency value of the scale was found to be 0.91. MADM scores were found to be highest for midwives (33.28±10.10) and lowest for family physicians (23.89±11.44). More than half of the midwives who have been cared for have a high autonomy score on the scale of MADM (%54.4). \nConclusion: MADM scale was found to be valid and reliable in Turkey to assess decision-making experiences during maternity care.","PeriodicalId":375851,"journal":{"name":"Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54803/sauhsd.1197456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The focus of the study is women's experiences of autonomy while making decisions about their care during pregnancy, labour and birth. The aim of this study is to adapt the Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale (MADM), developed by Vedam et al. in 2017, into Turkish health care culture. Methods: The survey was conducted May 15th to August 15th 2019. 344 women participated in the study and 286 women answered the questionnaire in total. The data were evaluated using the SPSS package software. Findings related to construct validity of the scale were made using exploratory factor analysis method. Results: Reliability of the Turkish form of the scale was performed with Cronbach’s Alfa and the internal consistency value of the scale was found to be 0.91. MADM scores were found to be highest for midwives (33.28±10.10) and lowest for family physicians (23.89±11.44). More than half of the midwives who have been cared for have a high autonomy score on the scale of MADM (%54.4). Conclusion: MADM scale was found to be valid and reliable in Turkey to assess decision-making experiences during maternity care.
土耳其语版母亲自主决策量表的效度与信度研究
目的:研究的重点是妇女在怀孕、分娩和分娩期间自主决定护理的经验。本研究的目的是将Vedam等人于2017年开发的母亲决策自主权量表(MADM)适应土耳其医疗保健文化。方法:调查时间为2019年5月15日至8月15日。344名女性参与了这项研究,286名女性总共回答了问卷。采用SPSS软件包对数据进行评价。采用探索性因子分析法对量表的结构效度进行分析。结果:采用Cronbach 's alpha量表对土耳其语量表进行信度检验,量表内部一致性值为0.91。助产士MADM得分最高(33.28±10.10),家庭医生最低(23.89±11.44)。在接受照顾的助产士中,有一半以上的人在MADM量表上的自主权得分很高(%54.4)。结论:MADM量表在土耳其被发现是有效和可靠的评估产妇护理决策经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信