{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"Shreya Atrey","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198848950.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This conclusion closes the book with a reminder that the endeavour to have the traditional model of discrimination law fit intersectionality may be ill-conceived. It thus highlights the urgency of remoulding discrimination law for the purposes of a distinct category of intersectional discrimination per se. It reiterates the theoretical and doctrinal steps needed to do this. The book concludes by seeing the present work as just one part of intersectionality’s transformative agenda and it underscores the significance of broader non-judicial efforts in realizing intersectionality catholically.","PeriodicalId":115138,"journal":{"name":"Intersectional Discrimination","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intersectional Discrimination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198848950.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This conclusion closes the book with a reminder that the endeavour to have the traditional model of discrimination law fit intersectionality may be ill-conceived. It thus highlights the urgency of remoulding discrimination law for the purposes of a distinct category of intersectional discrimination per se. It reiterates the theoretical and doctrinal steps needed to do this. The book concludes by seeing the present work as just one part of intersectionality’s transformative agenda and it underscores the significance of broader non-judicial efforts in realizing intersectionality catholically.