Wolna gospodarka i silne państwo: co zawiodło?

Anna Ząbkowicz
{"title":"Wolna gospodarka i silne państwo: co zawiodło?","authors":"Anna Ząbkowicz","doi":"10.15290/oes.2022.03.109.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The article elaborates on an ordoliberal idea that contradiction between market and the state constitutes a false direction of thinking, and tries to show why it is so, in particular, when combating economic crisis is at stake. Research method – This is a review of literature authored by leaders of the ordoliberal stream of thought. Contents have been organized around the fundamental ordoliberal premise that free economy and strong state are intertwined and dependent on each other. Results – Reconstruction of an ordoliberal position is helpful since it creates an interesting perspective on the international economic and financial crisis of 2008–2009. It reveals that after the crisis private economic power has not been constrained, which constitutes an obstacle to free economy, while the state has not become capable of withstanding rival social groups which means it is continuously weak. Originality/value/implications/recommendations – The considerations presented overcome “market-state” dichotomy which was constituted as common wisdom thanks to mainstream economics. This is a unique attitude which is rather absent in Poland despite ordoliberal economics being reflected in economic policies as a theory of social market economy, with SME being referred to in Polish constitution.","PeriodicalId":373923,"journal":{"name":"Optimum. Economic Studies","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optimum. Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/oes.2022.03.109.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose – The article elaborates on an ordoliberal idea that contradiction between market and the state constitutes a false direction of thinking, and tries to show why it is so, in particular, when combating economic crisis is at stake. Research method – This is a review of literature authored by leaders of the ordoliberal stream of thought. Contents have been organized around the fundamental ordoliberal premise that free economy and strong state are intertwined and dependent on each other. Results – Reconstruction of an ordoliberal position is helpful since it creates an interesting perspective on the international economic and financial crisis of 2008–2009. It reveals that after the crisis private economic power has not been constrained, which constitutes an obstacle to free economy, while the state has not become capable of withstanding rival social groups which means it is continuously weak. Originality/value/implications/recommendations – The considerations presented overcome “market-state” dichotomy which was constituted as common wisdom thanks to mainstream economics. This is a unique attitude which is rather absent in Poland despite ordoliberal economics being reflected in economic policies as a theory of social market economy, with SME being referred to in Polish constitution.
目的-本文阐述了一种自由主义的观点,即市场与国家之间的矛盾构成了一种错误的思维方向,并试图说明为什么会这样,特别是在与经济危机作斗争的时候。研究方法:这是一篇由自由主义思潮的领导者撰写的文献综述。内容是围绕自由经济和强大国家相互交织、相互依存的基本自由主义前提组织起来的。结果-重建自由主义立场是有益的,因为它为2008-2009年的国际经济和金融危机创造了一个有趣的视角。它揭示了危机后私人经济权力没有受到约束,这构成了自由经济的障碍,而国家没有能力抵抗敌对的社会团体,这意味着它的持续弱势。原创性/价值/意涵/建议——所提出的考虑克服了“市场-国家”的二分法,这是主流经济学的共同智慧。这是一种独特的态度,尽管自由主义经济学作为一种社会市场经济理论反映在经济政策中,波兰宪法中提到了中小企业,但在波兰却很少有这种态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信