POLITIK HUKUM PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DI INDONESIA (Analisis Mengenai Intervensi Partai Politik terhadap Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan)

Abdurrahman Hakim
{"title":"POLITIK HUKUM PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DI INDONESIA (Analisis Mengenai Intervensi Partai Politik terhadap Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan)","authors":"Abdurrahman Hakim","doi":"10.15642/ad.2020.10.2.201-221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze the existence of political party intervention in legislative drafting on regulation No 1/1974 about marriage. Political party intervention is actually contrary to responsive legal theory that is applied in the formation of regulations in Indonesia. Political party intervention can change the legal content in the formulation of legislation because there are interests that are subjective. The implication, of course the resulting legal products will not solve problems in society that have been assessed as public issues. If examined from the perspective of public policy, Government intervention is likely to occur at the policy planning stage. This is due to the process, the party as an element of political power views the importance of the values ??of flow in order to be contained in the laws discussed. The result, the regulations that have been passed are far different from the proposed bills. One example is the Marriage regulation. Debate and rejection occur in the discussion of the article 2 (1) UUP 1974. The affiliation of Islamic parties considers marriage to be a matter of worship and religious values. On the other, Nationalist party affiliation refused because it did not reflect reception legal theory.","PeriodicalId":441184,"journal":{"name":"Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2020.10.2.201-221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper aims to analyze the existence of political party intervention in legislative drafting on regulation No 1/1974 about marriage. Political party intervention is actually contrary to responsive legal theory that is applied in the formation of regulations in Indonesia. Political party intervention can change the legal content in the formulation of legislation because there are interests that are subjective. The implication, of course the resulting legal products will not solve problems in society that have been assessed as public issues. If examined from the perspective of public policy, Government intervention is likely to occur at the policy planning stage. This is due to the process, the party as an element of political power views the importance of the values ??of flow in order to be contained in the laws discussed. The result, the regulations that have been passed are far different from the proposed bills. One example is the Marriage regulation. Debate and rejection occur in the discussion of the article 2 (1) UUP 1974. The affiliation of Islamic parties considers marriage to be a matter of worship and religious values. On the other, Nationalist party affiliation refused because it did not reflect reception legal theory.
印度尼西亚的跨宗教婚姻法政治分析(1974年政党对婚姻法干预分析)
本文旨在分析我国第1/1974号婚姻法立法起草过程中政党干预的存在。政党干预实际上违背了印尼法规形成中所应用的响应性法律理论。由于存在主观利益,政党干预可以改变立法过程中的法律内容。当然,由此产生的法律产品并不能解决被视为公共问题的社会问题。如果从公共政策的角度来看,政府干预很可能发生在政策规划阶段。这是由于在这个过程中,政党作为政治权力的组成部分看待价值观的重要性。为了包含在所讨论的定律中。结果,通过的规制与提案相去甚远。一个例子是婚姻法。在讨论1974年联合统一党第2(1)条时发生了辩论和拒绝。伊斯兰党派的从属关系认为婚姻是一个崇拜和宗教价值的问题。另一方面,国民党因不符合接受法理而予以拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信