Prioritizing the Options for Health-care waste Management in Qazvin: Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach

R. Kalhor, M. Kiaei, R. Mohebbifar, E. Bahrami, L. Mafi, L. Kalhor, M. Azmal
{"title":"Prioritizing the Options for Health-care waste Management in Qazvin: Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach","authors":"R. Kalhor, M. Kiaei, R. Mohebbifar, E. Bahrami, L. Mafi, L. Kalhor, M. Azmal","doi":"10.15412/J.JBTW.01050603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to an increase in population and the number of health-care centers and increasing use of disposable medical products over the last decades, there has been a remarkable increase in health-care wastes which can cause numerous problems if they are not managed properly. The present study was carried out in order to select the best method to manage health-care wastes through multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches. The present study was a descriptive-applied research that was conducted in Qazvin in 2016. The study sample consisted of 28 experts belonging to 5 groups that were selected through purposefully sampling method. After the questionnaire was designed, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to measure the weight of the criteria. Afterward, TOPSIS method was utilized to rank different disposal methods of health-care waste. Based on the opinion of experts of the 5 groups about the weight of the criteria and the results of the weighting phase, it was indicated that the highest weight was related to air residuals criterion and environmental impacts, and the lowest to the cost criterion. According to the study inclusion criteria, the final results of the ranking are respectively irradiation (0.83), microwave (0.79), steam sterilization (autoclave) (0.75), chemical disinfection (0.55), sanitary landfill (0.35), and finally incineration (0.29). The results of the current study indicated that according to the groups under investigation, the best methods to dispose of health-care wastes in Qazvin are irradiation and microwave. According to this finding, the policymakers can plan to make more use of these two methods in order to dispose and disinfect health-care wastes. © 2016 Rohollah Kalhor et al.","PeriodicalId":119340,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biology and Today`s World","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biology and Today`s World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15412/J.JBTW.01050603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Due to an increase in population and the number of health-care centers and increasing use of disposable medical products over the last decades, there has been a remarkable increase in health-care wastes which can cause numerous problems if they are not managed properly. The present study was carried out in order to select the best method to manage health-care wastes through multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches. The present study was a descriptive-applied research that was conducted in Qazvin in 2016. The study sample consisted of 28 experts belonging to 5 groups that were selected through purposefully sampling method. After the questionnaire was designed, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was employed to measure the weight of the criteria. Afterward, TOPSIS method was utilized to rank different disposal methods of health-care waste. Based on the opinion of experts of the 5 groups about the weight of the criteria and the results of the weighting phase, it was indicated that the highest weight was related to air residuals criterion and environmental impacts, and the lowest to the cost criterion. According to the study inclusion criteria, the final results of the ranking are respectively irradiation (0.83), microwave (0.79), steam sterilization (autoclave) (0.75), chemical disinfection (0.55), sanitary landfill (0.35), and finally incineration (0.29). The results of the current study indicated that according to the groups under investigation, the best methods to dispose of health-care wastes in Qazvin are irradiation and microwave. According to this finding, the policymakers can plan to make more use of these two methods in order to dispose and disinfect health-care wastes. © 2016 Rohollah Kalhor et al.
确定加兹温医疗废物管理方案的优先次序:采用多标准决策方法
由于过去几十年来人口和保健中心数量的增加以及一次性医疗产品使用的增加,保健废物显著增加,如果管理不当,可能会造成许多问题。开展本研究的目的是通过多标准决策(MCDM)方法选择管理医疗废物的最佳方法。本研究是一项描述性应用研究,于2016年在加兹温进行。本研究样本由5组28名专家组成,采用有目的抽样法抽取。问卷设计完成后,采用层次分析法(AHP)衡量各指标的权重。然后,运用TOPSIS法对不同的医疗废弃物处理方式进行排序。根据5个专家组专家对各指标权重的意见和加权阶段的结果,得出空气残留指标和环境影响指标权重最高,成本指标权重最低。根据研究纳入标准,最终排序结果分别为辐照(0.83)、微波(0.79)、蒸汽灭菌(高压釜)(0.75)、化学消毒(0.55)、卫生填埋(0.35)、焚烧(0.29)。目前的研究结果表明,根据接受调查的小组,在加兹温处置卫生保健废物的最佳方法是辐照和微波。根据这一发现,决策者可以计划更多地利用这两种方法来处理和消毒卫生保健废物。©2016 Rohollah Kalhor等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信