Caregrief scale confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of portuguese caregivers

J. Vasconcelos-Raposo, C. Teixeira, Ana M. Ribeiro, A. Silva, Beatriz Santos
{"title":"Caregrief scale confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of portuguese caregivers","authors":"J. Vasconcelos-Raposo, C. Teixeira, Ana M. Ribeiro, A. Silva, Beatriz Santos","doi":"10.26580/PTHJ.ART19-2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a great deal of information about caregivers’ suffering, however, there is a lack of scales in Portugal that evaluate this dimension of human behavior. The purpose of this study was to validate and adapt the Caregiver Grief Scale (CGS), developed by Franziska Meichsner, Denise Schinkothe and Gabriele Wilz (2016) for the German population, in order to assess the degree of suffering of caregivers. In order to analyze the psychometric properties of the instrument, we used confirmatory factorial analysis with a sample of 150 caregivers (formal and informal). The results did not confirm the proposal of a 4-factor model (emotional pain, relational loss, absolute loss, and loss acceptance), as proposed by the German study. Subsequently, we used the exploratory factorial analysis that suggested a unifactorial model, which confirmatory factorial analysis showed was more adequate for the study sample, with values of: χ² / df = 2.023; CFI = .970; GIF = .923; RMSEA = .083; AIC = 110,724. In addition, the internal consistency analysis indicated a Cronbach alpha of .936 and the Composite Reliability was .934. It was concluded that the multifactorial structure suggested for German caregivers was not replicated and that for the Portuguese population suffering is a unifactorial construct. It is recommended that future studies, in Portugal, be carried out with a differentiated sample of caregivers.","PeriodicalId":185696,"journal":{"name":"PSYCHTECH & HEALTH JOURNAL","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSYCHTECH & HEALTH JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26580/PTHJ.ART19-2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a great deal of information about caregivers’ suffering, however, there is a lack of scales in Portugal that evaluate this dimension of human behavior. The purpose of this study was to validate and adapt the Caregiver Grief Scale (CGS), developed by Franziska Meichsner, Denise Schinkothe and Gabriele Wilz (2016) for the German population, in order to assess the degree of suffering of caregivers. In order to analyze the psychometric properties of the instrument, we used confirmatory factorial analysis with a sample of 150 caregivers (formal and informal). The results did not confirm the proposal of a 4-factor model (emotional pain, relational loss, absolute loss, and loss acceptance), as proposed by the German study. Subsequently, we used the exploratory factorial analysis that suggested a unifactorial model, which confirmatory factorial analysis showed was more adequate for the study sample, with values of: χ² / df = 2.023; CFI = .970; GIF = .923; RMSEA = .083; AIC = 110,724. In addition, the internal consistency analysis indicated a Cronbach alpha of .936 and the Composite Reliability was .934. It was concluded that the multifactorial structure suggested for German caregivers was not replicated and that for the Portuguese population suffering is a unifactorial construct. It is recommended that future studies, in Portugal, be carried out with a differentiated sample of caregivers.
葡萄牙照护者护理悲伤量表验证性因子分析
有大量关于护理人员痛苦的信息,然而,葡萄牙缺乏评估人类行为这一维度的量表。本研究的目的是验证和调整由Franziska Meichsner, Denise Schinkothe和Gabriele Wilz(2016)为德国人口开发的照顾者悲伤量表(CGS),以评估照顾者的痛苦程度。为了分析该工具的心理测量特性,我们对150名护理人员(正式和非正式)的样本进行了验证性析因分析。结果没有证实德国研究提出的四因素模型(情感痛苦、关系丧失、绝对丧失和损失接受)。随后,我们使用探索性析因分析提出了单因素模型,验证性析因分析表明该模型更适合研究样本,其值为:χ²/ df = 2.023;Cfi = .970;GIF = .923;Rmsea = .083;Aic = 110,724。此外,内部一致性分析显示Cronbach alpha为0.936,复合信度为0.934。结论是,对德国护理人员提出的多因素结构没有被复制,而对葡萄牙人来说,痛苦是一个单因素结构。建议未来的研究,在葡萄牙,与护理人员的不同样本进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信