Survey of the End-of-life Care Preferences of Patients with Mild Dementia and Differences from Hopes of Familial Caregivers Regarding End-of-life Care for Patients

Daisuke Toda, Ai Hirose, M. Hata, Mari Sasaki, Saki Ojyara, Yuya Takayama, Syoryoku Hino, Tatsuru Kitamura
{"title":"Survey of the End-of-life Care Preferences of Patients with Mild Dementia and Differences from Hopes of Familial Caregivers Regarding End-of-life Care for Patients","authors":"Daisuke Toda, Ai Hirose, M. Hata, Mari Sasaki, Saki Ojyara, Yuya Takayama, Syoryoku Hino, Tatsuru Kitamura","doi":"10.14442/generalist.44.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We investigated the end-of-life care preferences of patients with mild dementia and compared them with the hopes of caregivers regarding end-of-life care for patients. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among outpatients with mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment and their family caregivers who visited the Medical Center for Dementia. Results: We analyzed 50 pairs of dementia patients and their family caregivers. Of people with dementia, 24 respondents (48.0%) preferred“antibiotics and infusions for pneumonia”at the end of life. Eleven respondents (22.0%) preferred“central parenteral nutrition”. Eight respondents (16.0%) preferred“resuscitation”. For each end-of-life care item, the concordance rate between patients and caregivers on“prefer”/“do not prefer”was 0%-76%. Patients and their families who discussed end-of-life care had a significantly higher concordance rate for“resuscitation” preference than those who did not. Conclusion: For patients and their families to be able to make decisions they do not regret, it is important to promote discussions about end-of-life medical care before the patient’s condition becomes severe.","PeriodicalId":211485,"journal":{"name":"An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"An Official Journal of the Japan Primary Care Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14442/generalist.44.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We investigated the end-of-life care preferences of patients with mild dementia and compared them with the hopes of caregivers regarding end-of-life care for patients. Methods: A questionnaire survey was conducted among outpatients with mild dementia or mild cognitive impairment and their family caregivers who visited the Medical Center for Dementia. Results: We analyzed 50 pairs of dementia patients and their family caregivers. Of people with dementia, 24 respondents (48.0%) preferred“antibiotics and infusions for pneumonia”at the end of life. Eleven respondents (22.0%) preferred“central parenteral nutrition”. Eight respondents (16.0%) preferred“resuscitation”. For each end-of-life care item, the concordance rate between patients and caregivers on“prefer”/“do not prefer”was 0%-76%. Patients and their families who discussed end-of-life care had a significantly higher concordance rate for“resuscitation” preference than those who did not. Conclusion: For patients and their families to be able to make decisions they do not regret, it is important to promote discussions about end-of-life medical care before the patient’s condition becomes severe.
轻度痴呆患者临终关怀偏好及与家庭照顾者临终关怀期望差异调查
前言:我们调查了轻度痴呆患者的临终关怀偏好,并将其与护理者对患者临终关怀的希望进行了比较。方法:采用问卷调查的方法,对到老年痴呆医学中心就诊的轻度痴呆或轻度认知障碍门诊患者及其家庭照顾者进行调查。结果:我们分析了50对痴呆患者及其家庭照顾者。在痴呆症患者中,24名答复者(48.0%)在生命结束时倾向于“抗生素和肺炎输液”。11名受访者(22.0%)首选“中心肠外营养”。8名受访者(16.0%)选择“复苏”。对于每个临终关怀项目,患者和护理者对“喜欢”/“不喜欢”的一致性率为0%-76%。讨论过临终关怀的患者及其家属对“复苏”偏好的一致性明显高于没有讨论过的患者及其家属。结论:为了使患者及其家属能够做出不后悔的决定,在患者病情恶化之前促进临终医疗保健的讨论是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信