{"title":"Reject-Inference","authors":"Raymond A. Anderson","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844194.003.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rejects had not the opportunity to perform. Marginal Rejects are often cherry-picked based upon other data, or cheapened through down-sells, which distorts an Accepts-only model. Reject inference addresses resultant distortions but is contentious. (1) The basics—i) pointers—basic considerations; ii) missing at random, or not; iii) terminology—data manipulation, allocation, methodology; iv) characteristic analysis—for reject inference; v) swap-set analysis—proposed versus past; v) population flow diagram. (2) Intermediate models—especially ‘known Good/Bad’, which may use bureaux’s performance data. Others are Accept/Reject and Cashed/Uncashed. Possible formulae are provided for extrapolated performance assignments. (3) Inference smorgasbord—i) supplementation; ii) performance surrogates; iii) reject is Bad; iv) augmentation; v) weight of evidence (WoE) adjustments; vi) iterative reclassification; vii) extrapolation of accept performance. (4) Favoured technique—involving i) fuzzy-parcelling—record cloning and weight adjustments; ii) extrapolation—graphical setting of performance-adjustment parameters; iii) attribute-level adjustments—where needed; v) practicalities—variable names and coding, with an example.","PeriodicalId":286194,"journal":{"name":"Credit Intelligence & Modelling","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Credit Intelligence & Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192844194.003.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Rejects had not the opportunity to perform. Marginal Rejects are often cherry-picked based upon other data, or cheapened through down-sells, which distorts an Accepts-only model. Reject inference addresses resultant distortions but is contentious. (1) The basics—i) pointers—basic considerations; ii) missing at random, or not; iii) terminology—data manipulation, allocation, methodology; iv) characteristic analysis—for reject inference; v) swap-set analysis—proposed versus past; v) population flow diagram. (2) Intermediate models—especially ‘known Good/Bad’, which may use bureaux’s performance data. Others are Accept/Reject and Cashed/Uncashed. Possible formulae are provided for extrapolated performance assignments. (3) Inference smorgasbord—i) supplementation; ii) performance surrogates; iii) reject is Bad; iv) augmentation; v) weight of evidence (WoE) adjustments; vi) iterative reclassification; vii) extrapolation of accept performance. (4) Favoured technique—involving i) fuzzy-parcelling—record cloning and weight adjustments; ii) extrapolation—graphical setting of performance-adjustment parameters; iii) attribute-level adjustments—where needed; v) practicalities—variable names and coding, with an example.