Imparsialitas pada Reportase Investigasi

Bandung Conference Series: Journalism Pub Date : 2021-12-07 DOI:10.29313/bcsj.v1i1.22

Maudy Rizkiana, Kiki Zakiah

{"title":"Imparsialitas pada Reportase Investigasi","authors":"Maudy Rizkiana, Kiki Zakiah","doi":"10.29313/bcsj.v1i1.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study is conducted through the quantitative content analysis by understanding the application of nine journalistic elements in the elements proportional, and comprehensive, based on objectivity model of McQuail and Westershahl. This research is performed in Tempo Media for a specific case of “Ada Apa dengan Pizza?” and “Siasat di Balik Suap Reklamasi”. Based on this method, the problem in this research is formulated as follow, (1) how application of the nine of element of journalist in impartialityaspect.. This study used a coding sheet with three coder, use IRC and interview to developed the result. The result shows that Tempo Media has implement elemen proportional, and comprehensive on category (1) even handed evalution proven that journalist in writing result of investigate should examined by another three editor (Tempo.co, Tempo Newspaper, and Tempo magazine), (2) equal access proven that they insert two witness to comply proporsional element, (3) Non sensational proven by Tempo media put forward magnitude value, not sensational and novelty, (4) and non evalution proven that Tempo probihited any journalist to write investigate reporting by their opinion. \nAbstrak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis isi kuantitatif dengan menggunakan teori Sembilan elemen jurnalistik, focus pada elemen proporsional dan komprehensif, berdasarkan model McQuail dan Westerstahl. Penelitian ini meneliti media Tempo dengan kasus yang yang spesifik yaitu “Ada Apa dengan Pizza?” dan “Siasat di Balik Suap Reklamasi”, berdasarkan metode, pertanyaan penelitian ini dibuat sebagai berikut: (1) Bagaimana penerapan Sembilan elemen jurnalistik dari aspek impartialitas. penerapan dengan menggunakan lembar koding, menggunakan IRC dan wawancara . Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa media Tempo telah mengimplementasi elemen proporsional dan komprehensif dalam kategori (1) even handed evalution dibuktikan dengan wartawan dalam menuliskan laporan investigasi harus diuji kembali oleh tiga redaksi (Tempo.co, majalah Tempo, dan majalah Tempo ), (2) equal access dibuktikan wartawan selalu menuliskan dua saksi untuk memenuhi nilai proporsional, (3) non sensational dibuktikan dengan media Tempo dalam melakukan investigasu mengedepankan nilai magnitude bukan sensational atau pun kebaharuan, dan (4) non evaluative dibuktikan Tempo melarang semua jurnalis yang menuliskan investigasi untuk memasukan opini mereka.","PeriodicalId":293118,"journal":{"name":"Bandung Conference Series: Journalism","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bandung Conference Series: Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsj.v1i1.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. This study is conducted through the quantitative content analysis by understanding the application of nine journalistic elements in the elements proportional, and comprehensive, based on objectivity model of McQuail and Westershahl. This research is performed in Tempo Media for a specific case of “Ada Apa dengan Pizza?” and “Siasat di Balik Suap Reklamasi”. Based on this method, the problem in this research is formulated as follow, (1) how application of the nine of element of journalist in impartialityaspect.. This study used a coding sheet with three coder, use IRC and interview to developed the result. The result shows that Tempo Media has implement elemen proportional, and comprehensive on category (1) even handed evalution proven that journalist in writing result of investigate should examined by another three editor (Tempo.co, Tempo Newspaper, and Tempo magazine), (2) equal access proven that they insert two witness to comply proporsional element, (3) Non sensational proven by Tempo media put forward magnitude value, not sensational and novelty, (4) and non evalution proven that Tempo probihited any journalist to write investigate reporting by their opinion. Abstrak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis isi kuantitatif dengan menggunakan teori Sembilan elemen jurnalistik, focus pada elemen proporsional dan komprehensif, berdasarkan model McQuail dan Westerstahl. Penelitian ini meneliti media Tempo dengan kasus yang yang spesifik yaitu “Ada Apa dengan Pizza?” dan “Siasat di Balik Suap Reklamasi”, berdasarkan metode, pertanyaan penelitian ini dibuat sebagai berikut: (1) Bagaimana penerapan Sembilan elemen jurnalistik dari aspek impartialitas. penerapan dengan menggunakan lembar koding, menggunakan IRC dan wawancara . Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa media Tempo telah mengimplementasi elemen proporsional dan komprehensif dalam kategori (1) even handed evalution dibuktikan dengan wartawan dalam menuliskan laporan investigasi harus diuji kembali oleh tiga redaksi (Tempo.co, majalah Tempo, dan majalah Tempo ), (2) equal access dibuktikan wartawan selalu menuliskan dua saksi untuk memenuhi nilai proporsional, (3) non sensational dibuktikan dengan media Tempo dalam melakukan investigasu mengedepankan nilai magnitude bukan sensational atau pun kebaharuan, dan (4) non evaluative dibuktikan Tempo melarang semua jurnalis yang menuliskan investigasi untuk memasukan opini mereka.

查看原文本刊更多论文

调查报告的含蓄

摘要本研究以McQuail和Westershahl的客观性模型为基础，通过定量的内容分析，了解九种新闻要素在要素比例、要素综合中的应用。本研究是Tempo Media针对“Ada Apa denengan Pizza?”和“Siasat di Balik Suap Reklamasi”。基于这一方法，本研究的问题形成如下:(1)记者的九个要素在公正性方面如何运用。本研究采用三名编码员的编码表，采用IRC和访谈的方式来开发结果。结果表明，Tempo Media的实施要素成比例，综合第(1)类的均手评价证明，记者的写作调查结果应由另外三名编辑(Tempo)审查。(2)平等准入证明他们插入两名证人符合比例要素，(3)非煽动性证明Tempo媒体提出的是量值，而不是煽动性和新颖性，(4)非评价证明Tempo禁止任何记者根据他们的意见撰写调查性报道。Abstrak。Penelitian的孟古纳坎方法分析是定量的，孟古纳坎方法分析是Sembilan元素的新闻性，focus元素的比例性综合，berdasarkan模型McQuail dan Westerstahl。Penelitian ini meneliti媒体Tempo登干kasus yang spespifik yitu“阿达阿登干披萨?”(1)新闻媒体的公正性、公正性、公正性、公正性。日本登干，孟古纳罕，孟古纳罕IRC丹瓦万卡拉。(1)公平的评价，公正的评价，公正的评价，公正的评价，公正的评价，公正的评价，公正的评价，公正的评价，公正的评价，公正的评价。(3)非煽动性的煽动性传播媒介Tempo dalam melakukan investigasu mengedepankan nilai magnitude bukan煽动性的atau pun kebaharan，但(4)非评价性的煽动性传播媒介Tempo melanang semua jurnalis yang menuliskan investigasi untuk memasukan opini mereka。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Bandung Conference Series: Journalism

自引率

0.00%

发文量