Encryption for the masses? An analysis of PGP key usage

Sven Braun, A. Oostveen
{"title":"Encryption for the masses? An analysis of PGP key usage","authors":"Sven Braun, A. Oostveen","doi":"10.17951/MS.2018.2.69-84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the rise of alternatives, email remains integral to technology-mediated communication. To protect email privacy the encryption software Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) has been considered the first choice for individuals since 1991. However, there is little scholarly insight into the characteristics and motivations for the people using PGP. We seek to shed light on social aspects of PGP: who is using PGP for encrypted email communication, how and why? By understanding those using the technology, questions on the motivations, usability, and the political dimension of communication encryption can be contextualized and cautiously generalized to provide input for the design of privacy-enhancing technologies. We have greatly extended the scale and scope of existing research by conducting a PGP key analysis on 4.27 million PGP public keys complemented by a survey filled out by former and current PGP users (N = 3,727). We show that a relatively small homogeneous population of mainly western, technically skilled, and moderately politically active males is using PGP for privacy self-management. Additionally, findings from existing research identifying poor usability and a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms of PGP can be confirmed.","PeriodicalId":171412,"journal":{"name":"Mediatization Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediatization Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/MS.2018.2.69-84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Despite the rise of alternatives, email remains integral to technology-mediated communication. To protect email privacy the encryption software Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) has been considered the first choice for individuals since 1991. However, there is little scholarly insight into the characteristics and motivations for the people using PGP. We seek to shed light on social aspects of PGP: who is using PGP for encrypted email communication, how and why? By understanding those using the technology, questions on the motivations, usability, and the political dimension of communication encryption can be contextualized and cautiously generalized to provide input for the design of privacy-enhancing technologies. We have greatly extended the scale and scope of existing research by conducting a PGP key analysis on 4.27 million PGP public keys complemented by a survey filled out by former and current PGP users (N = 3,727). We show that a relatively small homogeneous population of mainly western, technically skilled, and moderately politically active males is using PGP for privacy self-management. Additionally, findings from existing research identifying poor usability and a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms of PGP can be confirmed.
大众加密?PGP密钥使用分析
尽管替代品越来越多,但电子邮件仍然是技术媒介沟通不可或缺的一部分。为了保护电子邮件隐私,加密软件PGP (Pretty Good privacy)自1991年以来一直被认为是个人的首选。然而,对于使用PGP的人的特征和动机,很少有学术见解。我们试图阐明PGP的社会方面:谁在使用PGP加密电子邮件通信,如何以及为什么?通过了解那些使用该技术的人,可以将有关通信加密的动机、可用性和政治维度的问题进行情境化并谨慎地概括,为隐私增强技术的设计提供输入。我们对427万个PGP公钥进行了PGP密钥分析,并对以前和现在的PGP用户(N = 3,727)进行了调查,极大地扩展了现有研究的规模和范围。我们发现,一个相对较小的同质人群,主要是西方的、技术熟练的、政治上适度活跃的男性,正在使用PGP进行隐私自我管理。此外,从现有研究中发现的可用性差和缺乏对PGP潜在机制的理解可以得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信