[Attentional requirements for preparing to return a serve in tennis].

C Goulet, C Bard, M Fleury
{"title":"[Attentional requirements for preparing to return a serve in tennis].","authors":"C Goulet,&nbsp;C Bard,&nbsp;M Fleury","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies demonstrated that athletes use more efficient strategies than novices in sports with high perceptual requirements (Abernethy and Russel, 1984; Goulet et al., 1989; Starkes, 1987b). The aim of the present study was to investigate the attentional cost of information processing preceding action in tennis players of different calibers. The dual-task paradigm was used. The primary task consisted of identifying the type of serve (flat, slice, or top-spin) presented on 16-mm file. The secondary task was a manual response to an auditory probe. Results demonstrated that attentional requirements during information processing do not differ between experts and novices. Nevertheless, the experts' results on the primary task are significantly higher than those of novices, whether the primary task is performed alone or simultaneously with the secondary task. The attentional cost of information processed during the ritual phase of the serve is significantly higher than the costs for processing information from the preparation and execution of the serve. It appears, therefore, that attentional input effort is maximal before identification of the most important cues necessary for adequate performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":77060,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport","volume":"17 2","pages":"98-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of sport sciences = Journal canadien des sciences du sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrated that athletes use more efficient strategies than novices in sports with high perceptual requirements (Abernethy and Russel, 1984; Goulet et al., 1989; Starkes, 1987b). The aim of the present study was to investigate the attentional cost of information processing preceding action in tennis players of different calibers. The dual-task paradigm was used. The primary task consisted of identifying the type of serve (flat, slice, or top-spin) presented on 16-mm file. The secondary task was a manual response to an auditory probe. Results demonstrated that attentional requirements during information processing do not differ between experts and novices. Nevertheless, the experts' results on the primary task are significantly higher than those of novices, whether the primary task is performed alone or simultaneously with the secondary task. The attentional cost of information processed during the ritual phase of the serve is significantly higher than the costs for processing information from the preparation and execution of the serve. It appears, therefore, that attentional input effort is maximal before identification of the most important cues necessary for adequate performance.

[网球中准备回发球时的注意要求]。
最近的研究表明,在具有高知觉要求的运动中,运动员比新手使用更有效的策略(Abernethy和Russel, 1984;Goulet et al., 1989;斯塔克,1987 b)。摘要本研究旨在探讨不同水平网球运动员动作前信息加工的注意成本。采用双任务范式。主要任务包括识别在16毫米文件上呈现的发球类型(平、切或上旋球)。第二项任务是对听觉探针的手动反应。结果表明,专家和新手在信息加工过程中的注意需求没有差异。然而,无论是单独执行主要任务还是与次要任务同时执行,专家在主要任务上的成绩都显著高于新手。在发球仪式阶段处理的信息的注意成本显著高于从发球准备和执行过程中处理信息的成本。因此,在识别出足够的表现所必需的最重要的线索之前,注意力输入的努力是最大的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信