{"title":"Low- versus High-water level effect on subtropical benthic freshwater meiofauna","authors":"Ahmed Abada","doi":"10.5455/egysebz.20221229092731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little is known about meiofaunal responses to Low- versus High-Water-Level (L- vs HWL) particularly in the subtropics. Meiofaunal reaction was evaluated in three locations (deeply-different) in two man-made freshwater channels in (Rowaina and Shalma) Northern Nile Egyptian delta: 50, 100, & 150, and 900, 950, & 1000 metres distances from the sluice, respectively. LWL and HWL were in January and July 2019 respectively. Eight vs ten and nine vs eleven major taxa were noted in Rowaina H- vs LWL and Shalma L- vs HWL, respectively. Taxa had different susceptibilities to L- vs HWL. Nematode, hydracarina, and oligochaetes dominated in L- and HWL, (Shalma), and in HWL (Rowaina). Whereas Nematoda, Copepod, and Oligochaeta prevailed in LWL (Rowaina). Oligochaeta biomass was generally high in LWL and HWL. Hydracarina in LWL, and Nematode & Copepod in HWL had low biomasses in Rowaina and Shalma respectively. Abundances and biomasses were significantly different within and among channels. Environmental variables were significantly different only between water levels. It could be concluded that L- vs HWL has both direct and indirect (variabilities in environmental factors) impacts on meiofauna. Channel width & morphology, may impose extra influences. This study may enhance invertebrate surveys with hydrologically different freshwater bodies.","PeriodicalId":342785,"journal":{"name":"THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY (Zoology)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY (Zoology)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/egysebz.20221229092731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Little is known about meiofaunal responses to Low- versus High-Water-Level (L- vs HWL) particularly in the subtropics. Meiofaunal reaction was evaluated in three locations (deeply-different) in two man-made freshwater channels in (Rowaina and Shalma) Northern Nile Egyptian delta: 50, 100, & 150, and 900, 950, & 1000 metres distances from the sluice, respectively. LWL and HWL were in January and July 2019 respectively. Eight vs ten and nine vs eleven major taxa were noted in Rowaina H- vs LWL and Shalma L- vs HWL, respectively. Taxa had different susceptibilities to L- vs HWL. Nematode, hydracarina, and oligochaetes dominated in L- and HWL, (Shalma), and in HWL (Rowaina). Whereas Nematoda, Copepod, and Oligochaeta prevailed in LWL (Rowaina). Oligochaeta biomass was generally high in LWL and HWL. Hydracarina in LWL, and Nematode & Copepod in HWL had low biomasses in Rowaina and Shalma respectively. Abundances and biomasses were significantly different within and among channels. Environmental variables were significantly different only between water levels. It could be concluded that L- vs HWL has both direct and indirect (variabilities in environmental factors) impacts on meiofauna. Channel width & morphology, may impose extra influences. This study may enhance invertebrate surveys with hydrologically different freshwater bodies.
人们对低水位和高水位(L- vs HWL)的微生态反应知之甚少,特别是在亚热带地区。在北尼罗河埃及三角洲(Rowaina和Shalma)的两个人工淡水通道的三个地点(差异很大)评估了Meiofaunal反应:分别距离水闸50、100和150米,以及900、950和1000米。LWL和HWL分别为2019年1月和7月。罗维纳L- vs LWL和沙尔马L- vs HWL的主要分类群分别为8 vs 10和9 vs 11。不同分类群对L-和HWL的敏感性不同。线虫、水螅虫和寡毛纲在L-和HWL (sharma)以及HWL (Rowaina)中占主导地位。而线虫、桡足类和寡毛纲在罗维纳省占优势。低陆和高陆寡毛藻生物量普遍较高。LWL的水螅虫和HWL的线虫和桡足类动物分别在罗威纳和沙马的生物量较低。通道内和通道间丰度和生物量差异显著。环境变量仅在不同水位之间存在显著差异。由此可见,L- vs . HWL对小型动物有直接和间接(环境因子变异)影响。通道宽度和形态,可能会施加额外的影响。该研究可加强不同水文淡水水体的无脊椎动物调查。