Evaluating the Efficacy of Synthetic Fibre Pollination Control Bags in Sorghum During the Rainy Season

Anil Gaddameedi, A. A. Kumar, R. Phuke, D. Virk, H. Senior
{"title":"Evaluating the Efficacy of Synthetic Fibre Pollination Control Bags in Sorghum During the Rainy Season","authors":"Anil Gaddameedi, A. A. Kumar, R. Phuke, D. Virk, H. Senior","doi":"10.3923/IJPBG.2017.39.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Sorghum breeders traditionally use paper pollination control bags for hybridisation and generation advance. However, these bags get torn off in the rainy season and by birds searching for food. High incidence of grain mold also occurs in these bags. The major objective of this study was to test novel nonwoven synthetic fabrics as replacement for paper bags. Methodology: Three newly developed pollination control bags from synthetic polyester and polypropylene nonwoven fibres were tested against the paper bags at Patancheru, ICRISAT, India on four sorghum genotypes for bag traits and many quantitative characters in the rainy seasons of 2014 and 2015 years that were diverse in total rainfall which was 231.9 mm more in 2015 compared with 2014 (77% higher) with 11 more rainy days than that in 2014 (299.3 mm in 42 rainy days). Data were analysed using the factorial analysis of variance and Pearsonʼs correlations. Results: Bags were evaluated for three bag traits: Water resistance, intactness and ease of handling. The duraweb® SG1 and duraweb® SG2 were superior to other bag types for all these traits with duraweb® SG1 being significantly superior to duraweb® SG2. The duraweb® SG3 bag was similar to the standard paper bag for all bag traits. While bags did not show significant differences for grain yield they significantly differed for other six quantitative traits; duraweb® SG1 was the best performer followed very closely by duraweb® SG2 bag. The duraweb® SG1 bag was significantly superior to no bagging as well as all other types of bags for grain mold resistance. On average 12% bird damage on panicles was observed under paper bags compared with 36% on the uncovered panicles. Contrastingly, no bird damage was observed under bags made of all three novel materials. Conclusion: The new pollination bags made from nonwoven fabrics provide an effective alternative to traditional paper bags as they ensure near-ambient micro-environment within them for seed development and are strong enough to resist wind, rain and bird damage while allowing aeration to minimize fungal development in the rainy season. fibre pollination","PeriodicalId":356916,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3923/IJPBG.2017.39.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background and Objective: Sorghum breeders traditionally use paper pollination control bags for hybridisation and generation advance. However, these bags get torn off in the rainy season and by birds searching for food. High incidence of grain mold also occurs in these bags. The major objective of this study was to test novel nonwoven synthetic fabrics as replacement for paper bags. Methodology: Three newly developed pollination control bags from synthetic polyester and polypropylene nonwoven fibres were tested against the paper bags at Patancheru, ICRISAT, India on four sorghum genotypes for bag traits and many quantitative characters in the rainy seasons of 2014 and 2015 years that were diverse in total rainfall which was 231.9 mm more in 2015 compared with 2014 (77% higher) with 11 more rainy days than that in 2014 (299.3 mm in 42 rainy days). Data were analysed using the factorial analysis of variance and Pearsonʼs correlations. Results: Bags were evaluated for three bag traits: Water resistance, intactness and ease of handling. The duraweb® SG1 and duraweb® SG2 were superior to other bag types for all these traits with duraweb® SG1 being significantly superior to duraweb® SG2. The duraweb® SG3 bag was similar to the standard paper bag for all bag traits. While bags did not show significant differences for grain yield they significantly differed for other six quantitative traits; duraweb® SG1 was the best performer followed very closely by duraweb® SG2 bag. The duraweb® SG1 bag was significantly superior to no bagging as well as all other types of bags for grain mold resistance. On average 12% bird damage on panicles was observed under paper bags compared with 36% on the uncovered panicles. Contrastingly, no bird damage was observed under bags made of all three novel materials. Conclusion: The new pollination bags made from nonwoven fabrics provide an effective alternative to traditional paper bags as they ensure near-ambient micro-environment within them for seed development and are strong enough to resist wind, rain and bird damage while allowing aeration to minimize fungal development in the rainy season. fibre pollination
雨季合成纤维防粉袋在高粱上的效果评价
背景与目的:高粱育种者传统上使用纸质授粉控制袋进行杂交和代际推进。然而,这些袋子在雨季和鸟类寻找食物时被撕下来。谷物霉菌的高发率也发生在这些袋子中。本研究的主要目的是测试新型非织造合成布作为纸袋的替代品。方法:在印度ICRISAT Patancheru对3种新开发的合成聚酯和聚丙烯非织造纤维制的授粉控制袋与纸袋进行了2014年和2015年雨季的4种高粱基因型袋性状和许多数量性状的试验,这些品种的总降雨量不同,2015年比2014年增加231.9 mm(增加77%),比2014年多11个阴雨天(42个阴雨天299.3 mm)。数据分析采用方差的析因分析和Pearson相关分析。结果:对袋子的耐水性、完整性和易搬运性进行了评价。duraweb®SG1和duraweb®SG2在所有这些性状上均优于其他袋型,其中duraweb®SG1显著优于duraweb®SG2。duraweb®SG3袋在所有袋子特性上与标准纸袋相似。籽粒产量差异不显著,其他6个数量性状差异显著;duraweb®SG1是表现最好的,紧随其后的是duraweb®SG2包。duraweb®SG1袋明显优于不装袋以及所有其他类型的袋抗谷物霉菌。纸袋对穗部的鸟害平均为12%,未纸袋对穗部的鸟害平均为36%。相比之下,在这三种新材料制成的袋子里没有观察到鸟类的伤害。结论:新型无纺布传粉袋可有效替代传统纸袋,保证了传粉袋内种子发育的近环境微环境,且具有足够的抗风、抗雨、抗鸟害的强度,同时可在雨季通风,最大限度地减少真菌的繁殖。纤维授粉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信