On the intellectual history of freedom of contract and regulation

Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz
{"title":"On the intellectual history of freedom of contract and regulation","authors":"Hans-Wolfgang Micklitz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2587696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are we, private lawyers and contract lawyers, not convinced that we share a common understanding of freedom of contract, of‚ freedom’, of‚ contract’, and of the restriction of freedom of contract through ‘regulation’? Is this common understanding not the basis on which we all operate – implicitly or explicitly – in our intellectual discourse while cutting across different legal traditions and different legal cultures? I argue that this common understanding is no more than a rather superficial ‘gentleman’s agreement’ which allows us to communicate with each other whilst maintaining our own preconceptions. In fact, there are different models of freedom of contract and regulation in Germany, France, the UK and the European legal order, each deeply ingrained in their respective intellectual history.","PeriodicalId":131276,"journal":{"name":"Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2587696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Are we, private lawyers and contract lawyers, not convinced that we share a common understanding of freedom of contract, of‚ freedom’, of‚ contract’, and of the restriction of freedom of contract through ‘regulation’? Is this common understanding not the basis on which we all operate – implicitly or explicitly – in our intellectual discourse while cutting across different legal traditions and different legal cultures? I argue that this common understanding is no more than a rather superficial ‘gentleman’s agreement’ which allows us to communicate with each other whilst maintaining our own preconceptions. In fact, there are different models of freedom of contract and regulation in Germany, France, the UK and the European legal order, each deeply ingrained in their respective intellectual history.
论契约与管制自由的思想史
我们,私人律师和合同律师,难道不相信我们对合同自由、“自由”、“合同”以及通过“管制”限制合同自由有共同的理解吗?这种共同的理解难道不是我们所有人在跨越不同的法律传统和不同的法律文化时,在我们的知识话语中——或隐或明地——运作的基础吗?我认为,这种共识只不过是一种相当肤浅的“君子协定”,它允许我们在保持自己先入之见的同时相互交流。事实上,在德国、法国、英国和欧洲法律秩序中,存在着不同的契约自由和监管自由模式,每种模式都深深根植于各自的思想史中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信