CRITERIA FOR MONITORING THE RELIABILITY OF INFORMATION IN THE INFORMATION SPACE

Z. Brzhevska, N. Dovzhenko, H. Haidur, Andriy O. Anosov
{"title":"CRITERIA FOR MONITORING THE RELIABILITY OF INFORMATION IN THE INFORMATION SPACE","authors":"Z. Brzhevska, N. Dovzhenko, H. Haidur, Andriy O. Anosov","doi":"10.28925/2663-4023.2019.5.5260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is about criteria of reliability of information. The validity period of the information\nhas been determined. It is established that an important stage of selection, development of\nmethods and mechanisms for ensuring the reliability of information is the analysis of the\nprocesses of its processing. The definition of the information reliability assessment is given, and it\nis also established that the complexity of the information reliability assessment is information\nevaluation. To assess the accuracy of information, such features as the doubtfulness of the facts\npresented, the emotional coloring of the content, the tone of the content in relation to an object or event, the sensational content, the hidden content. These features will be based on monitoring the\nreliability of information in the information space, which aims to minimize the subjectivity of\npeer review of the content of authors from the point of view of their influential orientation\ntowards individuals of the information space. In order to minimize this subjectivism, the basis of\nevaluations is the key criteria for the reliability of information, which, unlike estimates, are\nlargely fully measured: the criterion of balance of information, the criterion for separating facts\nfrom opinions, the criterion for the accuracy and reliability of information, the criterion for\ncompleteness of information. Thus, there is a need to create an algorithm for assessing the\nreliability of information in the information space, which makes it possible to investigate\ninformation resources for the impact on them, identify problems of information security in a\ntimely manner, recommend proven solutions for use at critical sites, organize and to carry out\nspecial trainings at the state level, etc.","PeriodicalId":198390,"journal":{"name":"Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2019.5.5260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article is about criteria of reliability of information. The validity period of the information has been determined. It is established that an important stage of selection, development of methods and mechanisms for ensuring the reliability of information is the analysis of the processes of its processing. The definition of the information reliability assessment is given, and it is also established that the complexity of the information reliability assessment is information evaluation. To assess the accuracy of information, such features as the doubtfulness of the facts presented, the emotional coloring of the content, the tone of the content in relation to an object or event, the sensational content, the hidden content. These features will be based on monitoring the reliability of information in the information space, which aims to minimize the subjectivity of peer review of the content of authors from the point of view of their influential orientation towards individuals of the information space. In order to minimize this subjectivism, the basis of evaluations is the key criteria for the reliability of information, which, unlike estimates, are largely fully measured: the criterion of balance of information, the criterion for separating facts from opinions, the criterion for the accuracy and reliability of information, the criterion for completeness of information. Thus, there is a need to create an algorithm for assessing the reliability of information in the information space, which makes it possible to investigate information resources for the impact on them, identify problems of information security in a timely manner, recommend proven solutions for use at critical sites, organize and to carry out special trainings at the state level, etc.
信息空间中信息可靠性监测标准
这篇文章是关于信息可靠性的标准。信息的有效期已经确定。确定了选择、开发确保信息可靠性的方法和机制的重要阶段是对信息处理过程的分析。给出了信息可靠性评估的定义,确定了信息可靠性评估的复杂性是信息评估。为了评估信息的准确性,这些特征包括所呈现事实的怀疑性、内容的情感色彩、与物体或事件相关的内容的语气、煽情的内容、隐藏的内容。这些特征将基于对信息空间中信息可靠性的监测,其目的是从作者对信息空间中个人的影响取向的角度出发,最大限度地减少同行评议作者内容的主观性。为了尽量减少这种主观主义,评估的基础是信息可靠性的关键标准,这与估计不同,它在很大程度上是充分衡量的:信息平衡的标准,将事实与意见分开的标准,信息的准确性和可靠性的标准,信息的完整性的标准。因此,有必要创建一种算法来评估信息空间中信息的可靠性,从而有可能调查信息资源对它们的影响,及时识别信息安全问题,推荐在关键站点使用的经过验证的解决方案,组织和开展国家一级的专门培训等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信